Improved Workability and Strength of Rubberized Mortar Using Supplementary Cementitious Materials and Polypropylene Fibers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(63-2)712Keywords:
Rubberized Mortar, Supplementary Cementitious Materials, Polypropylene Fibers, Workability, StrengthAbstract
The recent past has shown that rubberized cementitious composites, despite their potential benefits such as improved ductility, impact resistance, and utilization of waste rubber, exhibit reduced workability and mechanical strength. This performance degradation is attributed to the lower density and higher elastic nature of rubber particles, which hinder compaction efforts and induce voids. Also, the hydrophobic nature of rubber particles repels water molecules and gives rise to pores. Present research focuses on improving the workability and strength of rubberized composites by using waste materials like silica fumes and fly ash and adding polypropylene fibers. A 1:4 cement-sand mortar was prepared as a control specimen. A systematic study was conducted in which the ingredients were added incrementally. First, 5% of the sand was replaced with crumb rubber. In the next group of samples, silica fume and fly ash were included as extra materials in the cement, replacing 2.5% of the cement's weight. Subsequently, a water reducer was introduced. Finally, in the last set of specimens, polypropylene fibers were added at a rate of 0.1% by volume of mortar. The results revealed that the incorporation of crumb rubber reduced the 28-day compressive strength from 8.5 MPa to 4.55 MPa, corresponding to a strength loss of 46%. The proposed modifications reduced this strength loss to only 7.4%, resulting in a 28-day compressive strength of 7.9 MPa. Similarly, the flow value increased from 80 mm to 100 mm after the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials. It is concluded that the careful incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials and synthetic fibers can improve the mechanical strength and workability of rubberized mortar.
References
1. K. Formela. Sustainable development of waste tires recycling technologies – recent advances, challenges and future trends. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research 4(3): 209-222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.06.004
2. M. Naddeo, G. Viscusi, G. Gorrasi, and D. Pappalardo. Degradable Elastomers: Is There a Future in Tyre Compound Formulation? Molecules 26(15): 4454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26154454
3. A.Q. Bhatti and A. Khitab. A clean approach through recycling of brick kiln dust and crumb waste rubber tires in the manufacturing of clayey bricks and cementitious composites. In: Advance Upcycling of By-Products in Binder and Binder-Based Materials. M.S. Kırgız (Ed.). Elsevier, USA pp. 291-307 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90791-0.00015-9
4. L. Liu, Q. Guan, L. Zhang, C. Liu, X. Chen, and X. Cai. Evaluation of the compressive-strength reducing behavior of concrete containing rubber aggregate. Cleaner Materials 4: 100057 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100057
5. M. Qureshi, J. Li, C. Wu, and D. Sheng. Mechanical strength of rubberized concrete: Effects of rubber particle size, content, and waste fibre reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials 444: 137868 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137868
6. R.A. Assaggaf, S.U. Al-Dulaijan, M. Maslehuddin, O.S.B. Al-Amoudi, S. Ahmad, and M. Ibrahim. Effect of different treatments of crumb rubber on the durability characteristics of rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials 318: 126030 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126030
7. O. Youssf, M.A. Elgawady, J.E. Mills, and X. Ma. An experimental investigation of crumb rubber concrete confined by fibre reinforced polymer tubes. Construction and Building Materials 53: 522-532 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.007
8. Z. Jiang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Yu, X. Hu, X. Zhou, and Y. Zhang. Surface Treatment of Rubberized Waste Reinforced Concrete. Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 685067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.685067
9. U. Jonathan and M. Khaled. Effect of waste crumb rubber tyre as partial replacement of fine aggregates on fresh and hardened properties of concrete. International Journal of Physical Sciences 19(2): 96-111 (2024). http://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS2024.5068
10. R.B.N. Khan and A. Khitab. Enhancing Physical, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Rubberized Concrete. Engineering and Technology Quarterly Reviews 3(1): 33-45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852541
11. E. Eltayeb, X. Ma, Y. Zhuge, J. Xiao, and O. Youssf. Dynamic performance of rubberised concrete and its structural applications – An overview. Engineering Structures 234: 111990 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111990
12. A. Kashani, T.D. Ngo, P. Mendis, J.R. Black, and A. Hajimohammadi. A sustainable application of recycled tyre crumbs as insulator in lightweight cellular concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 925-935 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.154
13. O. Youssf and M. ElGawady. An overview of sustainable concrete made with scrap rubber. In: From Materials to Structures: Advancement Through Innovation - Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, ACMSM 2012, Sydney Australia, 11-14 December 2012. CRC Press, London, UK pp. 1039-1044 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1201/b15320-185
14. S.Z. Ejaz, C.T. Shafqat, U. Jameel, H. Choudary, and A. Khitab. Challenges in Translating Rubberized Mortar Properties to Concrete: Segregation and Shear Slump. Construction Technologies and Architecture 17: 43-50 (2025). https://doi.org/10.4028/p-1m7IXC
15. ASTM C150/C150M-22. Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2022). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0150_C0150M-22
16. ASTM C33-07. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2012). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0033-07
17. Y. Li, J. Mu, J. Hao, Y. Liu, X. Jiang, and X. Luo. Research on the particle characteristics of manufactured sands affecting the flow ability of fresh mortar. Construction and Building Materials 382: 131287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131287
18. ASTM C1240-20. Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2020). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1240-20
19. ASTM C618-19. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States (2019). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-19
20. ASTM C1116/C1116M-10a. Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2015). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1116_C1116M-10AR15
21. ASTM C494/C494M-19e1. Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2019). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0494_C0494M-19E01
22. A. Khitab, M.T. Arshad, N. Hussain, K. Tariq, S.A. Ali, S.M.S. Kazmi, and M.J. Munir. Concrete reinforced with 0.1 vol% of different synthetic fibers. Life Science Journal 10(12s): 934-939 (2013). https://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1012s/152_22376life1012s_934_939.pdf
23. ASTM C305-20. Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2022). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0305-20
24. ASTM C138/C138M-17a. Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2023). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0138_C0138M-17A
25. ASTM C642-21. Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2021). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0642-21
26. ASTM C1437-20. Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2020). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1437-20
27. ASTM C109/C109M-20. Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania United States (2020). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0109_C0109M-20
28. A. Benazzouk, O. Douzane, K. Mezreb, B. Laidoudi, and M. Quéneudec. Thermal conductivity of cement composites containing rubber waste particles: Experimental study and modelling. Construction and Building Materials 22: 573-579 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.11.011
29. A.J. Shaukat, H. Feng, A. Khitab, and A. Jan. Effect of Admixtures on Mechanical Properties of Cementitious Mortar. Civil Engineering Journal 6: 2175-2187(2020). https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091610
30. M. Khan and M. Ali. Effect of super plasticizer on the properties of medium strength concrete prepared with coconut fiber. Construction and Building Materials 182: 703-715 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.150
31. H. Hosseinzadeh, A. M. Salehi, M. Mehraein, and G. Asadollahfardi. The effects of steel, polypropylene, and high-performance macro polypropylene fibers on mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials 386: 131589 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131589
32. H.R. Pakravan and T. Ozbakkaloglu. Synthetic fibers for cementitious composites: A critical and in-depth review of recent advances. Construction and Building Materials 207: 491-518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.078
33. U. Safeer, R.B.N. Khan, and A. Khitab. Enhancement of concrete performance by using compound mixture of waste pottery and red brick powders. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation 10(2): 206-228 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2025.144878
34. O.M. Olofinnade, A.N. Ede, J.M. Ndambuki, and G.O. Bamigboye. Structural properties of concrete containing ground waste clay brick powder as partial substitute for cement. Materials Science Forum 866: 63-67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.866.63
35. H. Zhang, L. Zou, J. Ni, and Y. Wang. Study on the Polypropylene(PP) Fiber/Cement Mortar Workability. In: Composite Technologies for 2020. Elsevier, USA pp. 539-544 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-831-7.50093-6
36. M. Adjoudj, K. Ezziane, E.H. Kadri, T.T. Ngo, and A.Kaci. Evaluation of rheological parameters of mortar containing various amounts of mineral addition with polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Construction and Building Materials 70: 549-559 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.111
37. P.F.G. Banfill (Ed.). Rheology of Fresh Cement and Concrete. Proceedings of the International Conference organized by the British Society of Rheology, University of Liverpool, UK, (March 16-29 1990), Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK (1991). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482288889
38. N.N. Gerges, C.A. Issa, and S.A. Fawaz. Rubber concrete: Mechanical and dynamical properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials 9: e00184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00184
39. L. Wang, Z. Yu, B. Liu, F. Zhao, S. Tang, and M. Jin. Effects of Fly Ash Dosage on Shrinkage, Crack Resistance and Fractal Characteristics of Face Slab Concrete. Fractal And Fractional 6(6): 335 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6060335
40. P. Vellaichany, S. Priyadharshini, R. Sarguna, and S. Selvan. Studies on Effect of Silica Fume on Workability and Strength of Concrete. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation 1(6): 165-171(2019). https://doi.org/10.34256/irjmtcon21
41. A. Karaşin and M. Doğruyol. An Experimental Study on Strength and Durability for Utilization of Fly Ash in Concrete Mix. Advances In Materials Science and Engineering 2014: 417514 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/417514
42. Weather-Atlas.com. Climate and monthly weather forecast, Mirpur, Pakistan. Weather-Atlas. Published online at: https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/pakistan/mirpur-climate (Accessed: Feb 04, 2026).
43. D. Sathyan, K.B. Anand, K.M. Mini, and S. Aparna. Optimization of superplasticizer in portland pozzolana cement mortar and concrete. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 310: 012036 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/310/1/012036
44. A.M. Al-Ghaban, H.A. Jaber, and A.A. Shaher. Investigation of Addition Different Fibers on the Performance of Cement Mortar. Engineering and Technology Journal 36(A9): 957-965 (2018). https://www.uotechnology.edu.iq/tec_magaz/2018/Volume36/Engineering/No92018/Text/[3]Text.pdf
45. A.M. Neville (Ed.). Properties of Concrete. Perason, Prentice Hall, India (2012).
46. P.K. Mehta and P J.M. Monteiro (Eds.). Concrete Microstructure, Properties and Materials. McGraw Hill, New York, USA (2017).
47. V.S. Jebadurai and D. Tensing. Mechanical Properties of Latex Mortar for Brick Masonry. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 7(6): 400–407 (2016). https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJCIET/VOLUME_7_ISSUE_6/IJCIET_07_06_044.pdf
48. R. Siddique and T.R. Naik. Properties of concrete containing scrap-tire rubber – an overview. Waste Management 24(6): 563-569 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.01.006
49. B.S. Thomas, R.C. Gupta, and V.J. Panicker. Recycling of waste tire rubber as aggregate in concrete: durability-related performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(1): 504-513(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.046
50. A. Asad, S. Iftikhar, and A. Khitab. Waste brick and marble powders as sustainable additives for improving slag-based concrete. Journal of Building Engineering 111: 113625(2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113625
51. S.M.A. El-Gamal, F.M. Al-Nowaiser, and A.O. Al-Baity. Effect of superplasticizers on the hydration kinetic and mechanical properties of Portland cement pastes. Journal of Advanced Research 3(2): 119-124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.008
52. F.R.C. Ribeiro, A.S. Ruviaro, P.R. de Matos, and A.P. Kirchheim. Impact of different superplasticizers on hydration, rheology, mechanical strength, and environmental evaluation of LC3 cements. Case Studies in Construction Materials 23:e05347 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05347
53. S. Mohamed, H. Elemam, M.H. Seleem, and H.E.M. Sallam. Effect of fiber addition on strength and toughness of rubberized concretes. Scientific Reports 14: 4346 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54763-w
54. J. Wang, C. Zhao, Q. Li, G. Song, and Y. Hu. The synergistic effect of recycled steel fibers and rubber aggregates from waste tires on the basic properties, drying shrinkage, and pore structures of cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials 470: 140574 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140574
55. X. Chen, G. Ge, Y. Zhou, S. Pan, and A. Ren. The effects of high-content rubber and steel fibers on the workability and mechanical properties of concrete. Composites and Advanced Materials 34: (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/26349833251343228
56. T. Alexandru, B. Marinela, D. Laura, and B. Irina. Mechanical and Environmental Performances of Concrete Using Recycled Materials. Procedia Manufacturing 32: 253-258 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.211
57. M. Haroon, R.B.N. Khan, and A. Khitab. Performance of concrete containing waste demolished concrete powder as a partial substitute for cement. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 43(4): 573–590 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2024-0002
58. L.A. Le, G.D. Nguyen, H.H. Bui, A.H. Sheikh, and A. Kotousov. Incorporation of micro-cracking and fibre bridging mechanisms in constitutive modelling of fibre reinforced concrete. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 133:103732 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103732
59. A. Khitab, S. Ahmad, R.A. Khan, M.T. Arshad, W. Anwar, J. Tariq, A.S.R. Khan, R.B.N. Khan, A. Jalil, and Z. Tariq. Production of Biochar and Its Potential Application in Cementitious Composites. Crystals 11(5):527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11050527
