Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Tobacco Farming in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Impact of Tobacco Farming in Pakistan

Authors

  • Qurat-ul-ain Altaf Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Women University, Swabi, Pakistan
  • Abid Hussain Social Sciences Research Institute, PARC-National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Bilal Khan Yousafzai Social Sciences Research Institute, PARC-National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(59-3)723

Keywords:

Deforestation, Resource degradation, GTS, PPE, Tobacco, Pakistan

Abstract

Tobacco production and curing cause a threat to the environment through injudicious use of pesticides, imbalanced use of chemical fertilizers, and excessive consumption of local firewood. Keeping all this in retrospect, this study has been designed to assess the impact of tobacco farming on family workers, and witness on spot involvement of children and nursing/ expecting mothers in tobacco-related health-hazardous tasks. General objective of the study is to document both the positive and negative environmental and socioeconomic externalities of tobacco production in the study area. It is based both on primary data and secondary statistics. Primary data has been collected from sixty farmers for the tobacco season 2021; including forty contract and twenty non-contract sample farmers. Farmers conceive that tobacco farming has a bad impact on human health (93 %), and causes degenerative deforestation and resource depletion (68 % each). Use of Green Tobacco Sickness gloves and Personal Precautionary Equipment was reported by eighty and sixty-two percent of the farmers, respectively. Impact of the disease on the workers’ health was reported by thirty-five percent of contracted farmers, and 90 percent of non-contracted ones. Thus, the
impact of the disease on human health was severe on non-contracted farms, mainly due to little or no use of Personal Precautionary Equipment. Cost of Personal Precautionary Equipment per season at the contracted farms was much higher (US$ 18.0) than at non-contracted ones (US$ 2.0). While the treatment cost of Green Tobacco Sickness or other agrochemical-related diseases of contracted farming households was 2.5 times lower than non-contracted ones. As per the results of the double log Ordinary Least Squares regression model about medical treatment cost, the coefficient of age of household head and use of Personal Precautionary Equipment have negative expected signs and are statistically significant. Laboratory tests of soil and water samples have revealed hazardous levels of Sodium Chloride and Dissolved Oxygen in canal water, which indicate imbalanced use of fertilizers by the growers and leaching of excessive nutrients below the root zone. Tobacco companies’ contracted growers were found to have less occupational health hazards. Thus, raising awareness among tobacco growers about the importance of adopting precautionary measures and use of Personal Precautionary Equipment can reduce the negative effects of tobacco
farming.

References

PTB. Tobacco Export by Companies during 2021-22. Pakistan Tobacco Board (2022). https://ptb.

gov.pk/tobacco-export-companies-during-2021-22 (accessed 2 October 2022).

PTB. Statistical Bulletin. Pakistan Tobacco Board, Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad (2020).

PTB. Economic significance of tobacco. Pakistan Tobacco Board (2022). https://ptb.gov.pk/economicsignificance-tobacco (accessed 6 June 2022).

U. Farooq, M. Ali, and A. Yasin. Tobacco cluster feasibility and transformation study. In: Cluster development based agriculture transformation plan Vision-2025. M. Ali (Ed.) Planning Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad, and Centre for Agriculture Impact of Tobacco Farming in Pakistan 77 and Bioscience International (CABI), Rawalpindi, Pakistan (2020).

S. Ullah, M. Shah, K. Ullah, R. Ullah, M. Ali, and F. Ullah. Economic analysis of tobacco profitability in district Swabi, Journal of Resources Development and Management 10: 74-79 (2015).

M. Nasrullah, L. Chang., K.N. Saddozai, A.O. Khalid, R. Bayisenge, and G. Hameed. Cost and net return of tobacco growers - A case study of district Mardan (KP-Pakistan). Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 35(2): 565-571 (2019).

R.H. McKnight, and H.A. Spiller. Green Tobacco Sickness in Children and Adolescents. Report 120, National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Maryland, United States (2005).

D.A. Khan, S. Shabbir, M. Majid, K. Ahad, T.A. Naqvi and, F. A. Khan. Risk assessment of pesticide exposure on health of Pakistani tobacco farmers. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 20 (2): 196-204 (2010).

A.I. Fraser. The Use of Wood by Tobacco Industry and the Ecological Implications. International Forest Science Consultancy, Rue Washington, Brussels, Belgium (1986).

M. Otanez. Social Disruption Caused by Tobacco Growing. Report on Economically Sustainable Alternatives to Tobacco Growing, World Health Organization - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Mexico (2008).

PMPKL. Annual Report - 2019, Phillip Morris Pakistan, Limited (PMPKL), Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (2019).

S. Ali, Q. Altaf, and U. Farooq. Acreage response of flue cured virginia tobacco in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural. Research 27(3): 217-225 (2014).

Z. Aman and N. Khan. Economic Analysis of Tobacco Production in Rural Area of District Swabi. Report, Institute of Development Studies, University of Agriculture, Peshawar (2020).

WHO. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Report SEA-Tobacco-6, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland (2004).

WHO. Needs Assessment for the Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Pakistan. Report, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland (2017).

K.U. Rahman, S.I. Haider, and A. Ali. Tobacco farming and its social impact on farmers in the rural Mardan, Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review 4 (3): 229-234 (2019).

M.J.R. Kutab, and N. Falgunee. Environmental degradation due to tobacco cultivation in Bangladesh. Malaysian Journal of Society & Space 11(7): 1-8 (2015).

K. Atreya. Pesticides use in Nepal: Understanding health cost from short term exposure. Report No. 28-07. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE), Kathmandu,

Nepal (2007).

S. Dasgupta, C. Meisner, D. Wheeler, K. Xuyen, and N. T. Lam. Pesticide poisoning of farm workers-implications of blood test results from Vietnam. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 210 (2):121–32 (2007).

M.S.M. Silva, M.G.C. Carvalho, J.C. Moreira, E.O. Barreto, K.F. Farias, C.A. Nascimento, F.M.N. Silva, T.G. Andrade, R.R. Luiz, R.S.M. Neto, and F.L. Ribeiro. Green Tobacco Sickness Among Brazilian Farm Workers and Genetic Polymorphisms. Report, BioMed Central Limited/ Spring Nature, London, United Kingdom (2018).

A.P.D. Sujoso, and T. Martiana. Occupational exposure to Green tobacco sickness among tobacco farmers in Jember, East Java, Indonesia. Report Achieving SDGs in South East Asia: Challenging and Tackling of Tropical Health Problems, Second International symposium of Public Health Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia (2017).

P.P.V. Oliveira, C.B. Sihler, L. Moura, D.C. Malta, M.C.A. Torres, S.M.C.P. Lima, A.L.A. Lima, C.E. Leito, V.L. Costa-e-Silva, J. Sobel, and T.M.

Lanzieri. First reported outbreak of Green Tobacco Sickness in Brazil. Cadernos de Saude Publica / Reports in Public Health 26(12): 2263-2269 (2010).

S. Guddad, U. Malagi, B. Kasturiba, and I Hasabi. Knowledge and life style factors of hypertensive subjects. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(3):373-376 (2012).

T. Saleeon, W. Siriwong, H.L.M. Perez, and M. G. Robson. 2015. Green tobacco sickness among Thai traditional tobacco farmers, Thailand. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 6: 169-176 (2015).

S.H. Gehlbach, W.A. Williams, L.D. Perry, J.I. Freeman, J.J. Langone, L.V. Peta, and H.V. Vunakis. Nicotine absorption by workers harvesting green tobacco. The Lancet 305(7905): 478-480 (1975).

S.K. Ghosh, J.R, Parikh, V.N. Gokani, S.K. Kashyap, and S.K. Chatterjee. Studies on occupational health problems during agricultural operation of Indian tobacco workers: A preliminary survey report. Journal of Occupational Medicine 21(1): 45-47 (1979).

M.Y. Ali, A.A. Kafy, Z.A. Rahaman, M.F. Islam, M.R. Rahman, I. Ara, M.R. Akhtari, and A. Javed. Comparative occupational health risk between tobacco and paddy farming people in Bangladesh. SSM - Mental Health 2: 100061 (2022).

A.K.M.G. Hussain, A.S.S. Rouf, S.N. Shimul, N. Nargis, T.M. Kessaram, S.M. Huq, J. Kaur, M.K.A. Shiekh, and J. Drope. The economic cost of tobacco farming in Bangladesh, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (24): 9447 (2020).

J. Madeley. Paraquat–Syngenta’s Controversial Herbicide. Report, Berne Declaration Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Pesticide Action Network UK Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific Foro Emaús (2002).

G. Nabi, H. Ahmed, and I. Ali. Spatial distribution of pH in the soil profiles of representative soil series from rice producing area, district Sheikhupura. Soil & Environment, 37(1) (2018).

T. Pattison, P. Moody, and J. Bagshaw. Vegetable Plant and Soil Health, Report, Department of Environment and Resource Management and the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, The State of Queensland, Australia

(2010).

D. Wall, and M. Plunkett. major and micro nutrient advice for productive agricultural crops. Report, Teagasc Environment Research Centre Johnstown Castle Wexford, Ireland (2021).

WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-26

How to Cite

Qurat-ul-ain Altaf, Abid Hussain, & Bilal Khan Yousafzai. (2022). Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Tobacco Farming in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: Impact of Tobacco Farming in Pakistan . Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 59(3), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(59-3)723

Issue

Section

Research Articles