Stringency Criterion for Modality Tests

Stringency Criterion for Modality Tests

Authors

  • Rana Muhammad Imran Arshad Department of Statistics Govt., S.E. College, Bahawalpur
  • Farrukh Jamal Department of Statistics Govt., S.A. Postgraduate. College, Dera Nawab Sahib
  • Muhammad Akbar Ali Shah Department of Statistics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Gamze Ozel
  • Gamze Ozel
  • Shahina Imran Department of Economics Govt., S. E. College, Bahawalpur

Keywords:

Physical and Computational Sciences

Abstract

Different techniques in the field of multimodality testing have aimed at different goals. In this study, we compare four nonparametric modality tests kernel density estimation test or Silverman Bandwidth test proposed by Silverman [13], Hartigan DIP test proposed by Hartigan and Hartigan [8], proportional mass test by Cavallo and Ringobon [4] and excess mass test by Muller and Sawitzki [12]. The most stringent test is found for different sample sizes 50, 100, 200 when only only µ2 , µ2 and σ22 , µ2 and α are considered period

References

Bianchi. Testing for convergence: evidence from nonparametric multimodality tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 (4): 393-409 (1997). 2 Chen, A., Chen, J. & Kalbfleisch, J. A modified likelihood ratio test for homogeneity in finite mixture models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 63: 19–29(2001).

Cheng. & Hall . Calibrating the Excess Mass and Hartigan Dip Test Tests of Modality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 60: 579-590 (1998).

Cavallo, A. & Rigobon, R. The Distribution of the size of price changes, NBER Working Paper No. 16760, 1-40(1910).

Fisher. &Marron. Mode testing via the excess mass estimate. Biometrica 88: 499–517 (2001).

Hall. & York. On the calibration of Silverman’s test for multimodality. Statist.Sinica11: 515–536 (2001).

Hartigan . Algorithm AS217: Computation of the Hartigan Dip Test statistic to test for unimodality. Journal of Applied Statistics 34: 320–325(1985).

Hartigan. &Hartigan. The Hartigan Dip Test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics13(1): 70-84 (1985).

Henderson . Modes, Weighted Modes and Calibrated Modes: Evidence of Clustering Using Modality Tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics forthcoming (2006).

Hall. & York. On the Calibration of Silverman’s Test for Multimodality. Statistica Sinica 11: 515536 (2001).

Hall & OOI. Attributing a Probability to the Shape of a Probability Density. The Annals of Statistics 32 (5): 2098-2123 (2004).

Mueller & Sawitzki. Excess mass estimates and tests for multimodality. The Journal of the Society of America 86: 738 -746(1991). 13 Silverman. Some properties of a test for multimodality based on kernel density estimates in J. F. C. Kingman and G. E. H. Reuter (eds), Probability, Statistics, and Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983).

Silverman. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. 26, Chapman and Hall, London (1986).

Zaman A. Statistical Foundations for Econometrics Techniques. Academic Press, London (1996).

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Arshad, R. M. I. ., Jamal, . F., Shah, M. A. A. ., Ozel, G. ., Ozel, G. ., & Imran, S. . (2021). Stringency Criterion for Modality Tests: Stringency Criterion for Modality Tests. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: A. Physical and Computational Sciences, 55(3), 77–83. Retrieved from https://ppaspk.org/index.php/PPAS-A/article/view/141

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.