Improved PERC Solar Cell Design by TCAD Simulation
Improved PERC Solar Cell Design by TCAD Simulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(58-4)637Keywords:
TCAD Simulation, PERC Solar Cell, ARC, Passivation, Recombination, Surface TexturingAbstract
In this work, we aim to identify the performance limiting factors and consequently improve the performance of PERC solar cells through extensive TCAD based device simulation and modelling. Initially, a simplified planar PERC solar cell structure is simulated in Silvaco (Athena/Atlas), where the device geometry is selected according to an experimentally fabricated cell with an efficiency of 17.86%. The J-V curves and solar cell parameters such as Jsc, FF, Voc and efficiency (η) of the simulated cell are then fitted to the experimental performance parameters by incorporating relevant models as suggested by the literature. These include: carriers’ generation-recombination, mobility, statistics and bandgap narrowing. A good agreement is obtained, where the average percentage difference between simulated and experimental performance parameters is 0.65%. The solar cell performance is then improved to 21.52% by optimising the anti-reflective coating stack composition and thickness, and adding surface texturing. This increase in efficiency is attributed to lower surface recombination and reduced reflection due to light trapping. In addition, a textured front surface enhances the path-length of light, causing it to undergo multiple internal reflections which further increases light trapping, thus increasing Jsc by 7.31 mA/cm2.
References
R. M. Swanson, “Approaching the 29% limit efficiency of silicon solar cells,” Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference., pp. 889–894, (2005).
N. Guerra, M. Guevara, C. Palacios, and F. Crupi, “Operation and physics of photovoltaic solar cells: an overview,” Revista de I+D Tecnológico, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 84–95, (2018).
N. Boukortt, S. Patanè, and B. Hadri, “Development of High-Efficiency PERC Solar Cells Using Atlas Silvaco,” Silicon, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 145–152, (2019)
“Share of primary energy from solar, 2019” [Available online at https://ourworldindata.org/ renewable-energy#solar-in-the-energy-and- electricity-mix] (accessed 20th September, 2021)
A. W, Blakers, A. Wang, Adele M, Milne, J. Zhao, and M. A. Green, “22.8 % efficient silicon solar cell” Applied Physics Letters Vol. 55, no 13, pp. 1363-1363, (1989).
T. Dullweber and J. Schmidt, “Industrial Silicon Solar Cells Applying the Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) Concept-A Review,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1366– 1381, (2016).
J. Zhou, Y. Tan, W. Liu, X. Cai, H. Huang, and Y. Cao, “Effect of front surface light trapping structures on the PERC solar cell,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, no. 5, (2020).
A. Siddiqui and M. Usman, “Proton Irradiation in Simplified PERC Solar Cells: A Simulation- Based Framework” ECS Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 055007, (2021).
A. Siddiqui and M. Usman, “Reliability of PERC Solar Cells under Alpha Irradiation: A Simulation- Based Study for Space Applications” ECS Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 015003, (2021).
M. Kerr¬, J. Schmidt and A. Cuevas, “Comparison of the Open Circuit Voltage of Simplified PERC Cells Passivated with PECVD Silicon Nitride and Thermal Silicon Oxide”, Progress in Photovoltaic Research and Applications Vol 8: pp 529-536, (2000).
S. Clara, Device Simulation Software, “ATLAS User’s Manual,” vol. II, no. November, pp. 567– 1000, (1998)
S. Clara, “2D PROCESS SIMULATION SOFTWARE-ATHENA User’s Manual” vol. 5.10.0.R, no. August, (2004).
Renewable Resource Data Center (2004) National Renewable Energy Laboratory http://rredc.nrel.gov/ solar/spectra/am1.5/
D. B. M. Klaassen, “A Unified Mobility Model for Device Simulation-I. Model Equations and Concentration Dependence”, Solid-State Electronics Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 953-959, (1992)
A. Schenk, “Finite-temperature full random-phase approximation model of band gap narrowing for silicon device simulation”, Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 84, No.7, (1998)
C. Leguijt, P. Iolgen, J.A. Eikelboom et al, “Very low surface recombination velocities on 2.5 ~ cm Si wafers, obtained with low-temperature PECVD of Si-oxide and Si-nitride”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 34, pp 177-181, (1994).
T. Lauinger, J. Schmidt, Armin G. Aberle, and R. Hezel. “Record low surface recombination velocities on 1 Ω.cm p-silicon using remote plasma silicon nitride passivation”, Applied Physics Letters Vol. 68, No.9, 26 February (1996).
J. O. Schumacher, P. P. Altermatt, G. Heiser and G. Aberle, “Application of an improved band- gap narrowing model to the numerical simulation of recombination properties of phosphorus-doped silicon emitters” Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, vol 65, pp 95-103, (2001).
B. Min, H. Wagner, A. D. Shirazi et al, “Heavily doped Si: P emitters of crystalline Si solar cells: recombination due to phosphorus precipitation”, Physica Status Solidi RRL, vol 8, No. 8, pp 680–684 (2014).
A.W. Weeber, H.C. Rieffe, M.J.A.A. Goris, J. Hong, W.M.M. Kessels, M.C.M van de Sanden, and W.J. Soppe, “Improved Thermally Stable Surface and Bulk Passivation of PECVD SiNx:H using N2 and SiH4” Conference Paper, IEEE Xplore, June (2003).
M. Filipič et al., “Electrical and optical simulation of n-PERT solar cells with epitaxially grown emitters,” Energy Procedia, vol. 124, pp. 38–46, (2017).
W. Cai, S. Yuan, Y. Sheng, W. Duan, Z. Wang et al, “22.2% efficiency n-type PERT solar cell”, Energy Procedia 92, pp 399–403, (2016).
PV Lighthouse-Homepage [Available online at]: https://www2.pvlighthouse.com.au/calculators/ OPAL%202/OPAL%202.aspx (accessed 20th September, 2021).
H. K. Raut, V. K. Ganesh, A. S. Nair and S. Ramakrishna, “Antireflective Coatings: A Critical, in-depth Review”, Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 4, pp. 3779-3804, (2011).
