A Stable Version of the Modified Algorithm for Error Minimization in Combined Numerical Integration

Authors

  • Aijaz Bhatti Institution of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Owais Ali Rajput Institution of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan
  • Zubair Ahmed Kalhoro Institution of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(60-2)813

Keywords:

Numerical Integration, Weddle’s Rule, Boole’s Rule, , Six-Point Rule, Simpson’s 1/3 Rule

Abstract

The present study derives a stable version of “A Modified Algorithm for Reduction of Error in Combined Numerical Integration”. It is discovered that the earlier proposed scheme "A Modified Algorithm for Error Reduction in Combined Numerical Integration" exhibits accuracy fluctuations when the number of slits, , is increased .  Starting with the number of slits  and increasing the count of sub-intervals, the error increases spontaneously. This spontaneous spike in error is resolved by considering a better combination of quadrature rules. To this, the notable result of this study is the identification of an optimal choice for quadrature formulae that could minimizes error fluctuations in combined numerical integration regardless the number of slits ( ). With this revised choice, the error remains relatively stable and predictable even as the count of sub-intervals is increased.

References

K.S. Gordon. Numerical integration. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics ISBN: 0471975761 (1998).

M.M. Shaikh, M.S. Chandio, and A.S. Soomro. A modified Four-point Closed Mid-point Derivative Based Quadrature Rule for Numerical Integration. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series) 48(2): 389-392 (2016).

R.V. Dukkipati. Numerical methods. New Age International Publisher ISBN 10: 8122428134, ISBN 13: 9788122428131: 368 (2010).

A. Karpagam, and V. Vijayalakshmi. Comparison Results of Trapezoidal, Simpson’s 1/3 rule, Simpson’s 3/8 rule and Weddle’s rule. Asian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 2(4): 50-53 (2018).

M. Amanat. Numerical Integration and a Proposed Rule. American Journal of Engineering Research 4: 120-123 (2015).

A. Natarajan, and N. Mohankumar. A comparison of some quadrature methods for approximating Cauchy principal value integrals. Journal of Computational Physics 116(2): 365–368 (1995).

D.J. Liu, J.M. Wu, and D.H. Yu. The Super Convergence Of The Newton-Cotes Rule For Cauchy Principal Value Integrals. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 235(3): 696–707 (2010).

A.S. Soomro, G.A. Tularam, and M.M. Shaikh. A comparison of numerical methods for solving the unforced van der Pol’s equation. Mathematical Theory and Modeling 3(2): 66-77 (2013).

M.M. Shaikh. Analysis of polynomial collocation and uniformly spaced quadrature methods for second kind linear Fredholm integral equations – a comparison. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory 7(4): 91-97 (2019).

A.A. Bhatti, M.S. Chandio, R.A. Memon, and M.M. Shaikh. A Modified Algorithm for Reduction of Error in Combined Numerical Integration. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series) 51(4): 745-750 (2019).

W.H. Beyer. CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. 28th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press: pp 127 (1956).

F.B. Hildebrand. Introduction to Numerical Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book. Company, Inc., New York pp. 160-161 (1956).

R.L. Burden, and J.D. Faires. Numerical differentiation & integration numerical differentiation. Numerical analysis 174-184 (2011).

A. Amjad, F. Hamayun, and U. Muhammad. Simplified Numerical Analysis. Pakistan: Time Render, ISBN: 978-969-7821-01-3 (2018).

Downloads

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

Aijaz Bhatti, Owais Ali Rajput, & Zubair Ahmed Kalhoro. (2023). A Stable Version of the Modified Algorithm for Error Minimization in Combined Numerical Integration. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: A. Physical and Computational Sciences, 60(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(60-2)813

Issue

Section

Research Articles