Macromoths (Erebidae: Lepidoptera) and Geometer Moths (Geometridae: Lepidoptera) Species Diversity in Central Sindh, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(61-1)784Keywords:
Diversity, Erebidae, Geometridae, Moths, PakistanAbstract
Moths are primarily nocturnal, phytophagous, pests of agriculture, night pollinators, and potential bioindicators. The current study is the first to provide information on the diversity, richness, and abundance of moth species in central Sindh, Pakistan. Moths were collected by light traps, light sheets, and insect nets. A total of 517 specimens were collected during four seasons (Winter, Spring, Summer, and Autumn) and sorted out into 2 families. Moreover, Family Erebidae was sorted out into 3 subfamilies (Arctinae, Calpinae, and Erebinae) of 5 genera (Utethesia, Chalciope, Creatonotus, Grammodes, and Eudocima) with 8 species (Utethesia pulchella Linnaeusn1758, Utethesia lotrix Cramer 1789, Chalciope mygdone Cramer 1775, Creatonotus transiens Walker 1855, Grammodes geometrica Fabricius 1775, Grammodes stolida Fabricius 1775, Eudocima phalonia Linnaeus 1763, and Eudocima maternal Linnaeus 1767) while family Geometridae was sorted out into 3 subfamilies (Sterrhinae, Ennominae, and Geometrinae) of 3 genera (Scopula, Isturgia, and Microloxia) with 5 species (Scopula pulchella Fabricius 1794, Scopula minorata Boisduval 1833, Isturgia disputaria Guenee 1858, Isturgia Pulinda Walker 1860, and Microloxia herbaria Hubner 1800). However, the family Erebidae was found to be the most prevalent with 8 species while the family Geometridae was found to be the least prevalent with 5 species. However, the family Geometridae was found to be highest in abundance with 305 specimens while the family Erebidae was found to be lowest in abundance with 212 specimens. According to the localities, the highest value (0.91) of Simpson's index (D) was recorded for Matiari; while the lowest value (0.86) was recorded for Jamshoro. The survey locations featured varied moth fauna, as evidenced by the fact that Matiari was recorded as the highest value (2.394) Shannon index (H) while Jamshoro was recorded as the lowest value (2.034).
References
R.G. Gillespie. Naivete and novel perturbations: Conservation of native spiders on an oceanic island system. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 263–272 (1999).
A. Srivastava. Taxonomy of moths in India. Published by International Book Distributors. Deheradun, India (2002).
S.A. Gurule, and S.M. Nikam. The moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of northern Maharashtra a preliminary checklist. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(12): 4693-4713 (2013).
A.G. Butler. Illustrations of typical specimens of Lepidoptera: Heterocera in the collection of the British museum. Printed by order of the Trustees, London pp. 1877-93 (1889).
B.C. Zhang. Index of Economically Important Lepidoptera. Wallingford: CAB International pp. 599 (1994).
K. Enkhtur, G. Brehm. B. Boldgiv, & M. Pfeiffer. Effects of grazing on macro-moth assemblages in two different biomes in Mongolia. Ecological Indicators 133: 108421 (2021).
K. Sivasankaran. T.B. Thangadurai and S. Ignacimuthu. Studies on external genitalial morphology of subfamily Catocalinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Research in Biology 8: 631-642 (2011).
K. Enkhtur, B. Boldgiv, and M. Pfeiffer. Diversity and distribution patterns of geometrid moths (Geometridae, Lepidoptera) in Mongolia. Diversity 12: 186 (2020).
N. Vaughan. The diets of British bats (Chiroptera). Mammal Review 27: 77-94(1997).
A.K. Sharma, and U.K. Bisen. Taxonomic documentation of insect pest fauna of vegetable ecosystem collected in light trap. International Journal of Environmental Science: Development and Monitoring 4: 1-8 (2013).
W.G. Wilson, S.P. Harrison, A. Hastings, and K. McCann. Exploring stable pattern formation in models of tussock moth populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 94-107 (1999).
C.J. Macgregor, M.J. Pocock, R. Fox, and D.M. Evans. Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecological Entomology 40: 187-198 (2015).
K. Chandra. Moth diversity of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, India, and its conservation measures. In: Proceedings of the First South East Asian Lepidoptera Conservation Symposium, Hong Kong. R.C. Kendrick (Ed.), pp. 49-61 (2007).
W.T. Blanford, and G.F. Hampson (Eds.). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor and Francis, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street, London (1892).
G.T. Bethune‐Baker. XI. Notes on the Taxonomic value of Genital Armature in Lepidoptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 62: 314-338 (1914).
C. Heinrich. Some Lepidoptera likely to be confused with the pink bollworm. Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 807-836 (1921).
J.D. Prins. Lepidoptera Collection Curation and Data Management. InTech publishers Chapter 2, pp. 19 (2017).
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70925.
G. Brehm. A new LED lamp for the collection of nocturnal Lepidoptera and a spectral comparison of light-trapping lamps. Nota Lepidopterologica 40: 87-108 (2017).
J.R. Eyer. The morphological significance of the juxta in the male genitalia of Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 21: 32-37 (1926).
E.J. Van Nieukerken, L. Kaila, I.J. Kitching, N.P. Kristensen, D.C. Lees, J. Minet, and A.Z. wick. Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Animal Biodiversity: An outline of higher classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Z-Q. Zhang (Ed.). Zootaxa, Magnolia Press pp. 212-221 (2011).
A. Magurran. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA (2004).
A.A. Chandio, J. Yuansheng, and H. Magsi. Agricultural Sub-Sectors Performance: An Analysis of Sector-Wise Share in Agriculture GDP of Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Finance 8(2): 156-162 (2016).
W. Zhang, C. Shih, and D. Ren. Lepidoptera – Butterflies and Moths 619. In: Rhythms of Insect Evolution: Evidence from the Jurassic and Cretaceous in Northern China. D. Ren, C. Shih, T. Gao, Y. Yao, and Y. Wang (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ Chapter 27 (2019).
M.I. Khan, H. Ullah, Suleman, M.A.S. Khan, N. Muhammad, S. Zada and S. Hussain. A Review on Diversity of Butterfly Fauna in Pakistan. World Journal of Zoology 10: 313-317 (2015).
S. Maalik, S. Mushtaq, N. Rana, N. Ehsan, N. Bano, and A. Hafeez. Estimation of diversity-relative abundance and temporal distribution of lepidopteran species from agro-ecosystem of district Faisalabad, Pakistan. Journal of Agricultural Research 60(4): 305-316 (2022).
P. Gunathunga, C.D. Dangalle, and N. Pallewatta. Diversity and Habitat Preferences of Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Indikadamukalana, a Lowland Wet Zone Forest in Sri Lanka. Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment 12(1): 10-23 (2022).
A. A. Baikar and K. V. Naik. Biology of fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chilli under laboratory conditions. Plant Archives 16(2): 761-769 (2016).
D.D. de Miranda, H.M. Pereira, M.F.V. Corley, and T. Merckx. Beta diversity patterns reveal positive effects of farmland abandonment on moth communities. Scientific Reports 9: 1549 (2019).
M.M. Trigunayat, and K. Trigunayat. On the diversity of moth fauna of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 12(1): 40515-40518 (2021).
D. Rabl, B. Gottsberger, G. Brehm, F. Hofhansl, and K. Fiedler. Moth assemblages in Costa Rica rain forest mirror small-scale topographic heterogeneity. Biotropica 52: 288–301 (2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Upon acceptance of an article, its copyright will be assigned to the Pakistan Academy of Sciences.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY). Allows users to: copy the article and distribute; abstracts, create extracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.
