Capitalizing Trees for Carbon Sequestration as a Co-Benefit of Biophilic Urbanism: Capitalizing Trees for Carbon Sequestration as a Co-Benefit of Biophilic Urbanism

Namood-e-Sahar; Farzana  Kishwar; Arifa  Tahir; Muhammad Aboid  Ullah

doi:10.53560/PPASB(58-4)671

Authors

Namood-e-Sahar Department of Home Economics, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
Farzana Kishwar Government College for Women, Baghbanpura, Lahore, Pakistan
Arifa Tahir Department of Environmental Science, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
Muhammad Aboid Ullah Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(58-4)671

Keywords:

Carbon dioxide, Carbon sequestration, Biophilic, Urbanism, Biomass

Abstract

Biophilic urbanism as an emerging paradigm in the design field has initiated various patterns of naturebased mutation. One of the most associated environmental benefits of this amalgamation of nature in urban design is carbon sequestration [CS]. The main focus of this research was to quantify the potential of trees to act as carbon reservoirs. It was investigated by assessing the roles of several tree parameters, such as diameter at breast height [DBH], height, biomass, and age in CS. A comparison of native and exotic trees was also done for this. In a field survey at Jilani Park, Lahore, 16 different families of trees (N = 115) were measured through a non-destructive method and CS was calculated. The results revealed that sample trees sequestered 588452.9 kg of carbon with an annual rate of 19998.92 kg and Combretaceae (M = 11813.65, SD = 6492.38) and Moraceae (M = 9909.93, SD = 12695.26) were the dominant families in doing so. The Pearson’s correlation and linear regression analyses indicated that biomass and DBH have a significant positive relationship with CS, r = 0.100, R2 = 0.99, and r = 0.943, R2 = 0.89, respectively. The independent-sample t-test revealed a significant difference in CS capacity between native and exotic trees, with t (67.626) = 3.016, p =.004, and the greater biomass and DBH of native trees were the distinguishable factors. To conclude, trees are the most efficient source of carbon attenuation in the urban environment, and native species have an advantage in this process. This study will inspire new endeavours in research related to the benefits of biophilic cities.

References

T. Beatley. The Power of Urban Nature: The Essential Benefits of Biophilic Urbanism. In: Handbook of Biophilic City Planning and Design. Island Press, Washington, DC (2016)

P.J. Tabb. Biophilic Urbanism: Designing Resilient Communities for the Future. Routledge (2020).

S. Lee, and Y. Kim. A framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 127104 (2021).

J. Africa, J. Heerwagen, V. Loftness, and C. R. Balagtas. Biophilic design and climate change: performance parameters for health. Frontiers in Built Environment 5: 28 (2019).

A. Cabanek, M.E. Zingoni de Baro, and P. Newman. Biophilic streets: a design framework for creating multiple urban benefits. Sustain Earth 3, 7 (2020).

P. Newman, C. Hargroves, C. Desha, A. Reeve, O. Baghdadi, M. Bucknum, M. Zingoni, J. Soderlund, R. Salter, and T. Beatley Can biophilic urbanism deliver strong economic and social benefits in cities? An economic and policy investigation into the increased use of natural elements in urban design (2012).

M.S. Adiaha, A.H. Buba, and E.E. Tangban. Mitigating global greenhouse gas emission: The role of trees as a clean mechanism for CO2 sequestration. Journal of Agricultural Sciences–Sri Lanka 15(1) (2020).

R. Sedjo, and B. Sohngen. Carbon sequestration in forests and soils. Annual Review of Resource Economics. 4(1): 127-144 (2012).

I. Johnson and R. Coburn. Trees for carbon sequestration. Prime Facts, Industry and Investment, NSW Government (2010).

B. Mackey. Counting trees, carbon and climate change. Significance 11(1): 19-23 (2014).

R. Lal, P. Smith, H.F. Jungkunst, W. J. Mitsch, J. Lehmann, P. K. R. Nair, ... and N. H. Ravindranath. The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 73(6): 145A-152A (2018).

B.R. Singh, and O. Singh. Study of impacts of global warming on climate change: Rise in sea level and disaster frequency. Global warming—impacts and future perspective (2012).

W.J. Ripple, C. Wolf, T. M. Newsome, M. Galetti, M. Alamgir, E. Crist, M. I. Mahmoud, W. F. Laurance ... and 15,364 scientist signatories from 184 countries. World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience 67(12): 1026-1028 (2017).

S.N. Seo. Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate change policy negotiations and future directions. Regional Science Policy & Practice 9(2): 121-140 (2017).

R. Clémençon. The two sides of the Paris climate agreement: Dismal failure or historic breakthrough? The Journal of Environment & Development 25 (1): 3-24 (2016).

C.H. Wang, M.H. Ko, and W.J. Chen. Effects of Kyoto Protocol on CO2 Emissions: A Five-Country Rolling Regression Analysis. Sustainability 11(3): 744 (2019).

N. Grunewald, and I. Martinez-Zarzoso. Did the Kyoto Protocol fail? An evaluation of the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics 21: 1-22 (2016).

M.G. Lawrence, S. Schäfer, H. Muri, V. Scott, A. Oschlies, N. E. Vaughan, O. Boucher, H. Schmidt, Jim Haywood, and J. Scheffran. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nature communications 9(1): 1-19 (2018).

M. Marshall. Reforestation is seen as a way to help cool the climate, sucking excess warming carbon out of the atmosphere. But it’s not always that simple. Future (26 May 2020). https://www.bbc. com/future/article/20200521-planting-trees-doesnt- always-help-with-climate-change (accessed on 30 August 2021)

J.F. Bastin, Y. Finegold, C. Garcia, D. Mollicone, M. Rezende, D. Routh, C. M. Zohner, and T. W. Crowther. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365(6448): 76-79 (2019).

S.B. Hecht, K. Pezzoli, and S. Saatchi. Trees have already been invented: Carbon in woodlands. Collabra 2(1): 24 (2016).

R. Sharma, L. Pradhan, M. Kumari, and P. Bhattacharya. Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Potential of Tree Species in Amity University Campus Noida. In Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3(1): 52 (2020).

L. Shahzad, A. Tahir, F. Sharif, I.U. & H. Mukhtar. Assessing the impacts of changing climate on forest ecosystem services and livelihood of Balakot mountainous communities. Pak. J. Bot, 51(4), 1405- 1414 (2019).

Y. Malhi, J. Franklin, N. Seddon, M. Solan, M. G. Turner, C. B. Field, and N. Knowlton. Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375: (2020).

I. A .Khan, W. R. Khan, A. Ali, and M. Nazre. Assessment of Above-Ground Biomass in Pakistan Forest Ecosystem’s Carbon Pool: A Review. Forests, 12(5), 586 (2021).

A. M. Saral, S. SteffySelcia, and K. Devi. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in VIT University campus. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 263(2): 022008 (2017).

T. Atsbha, A.B. Desta, and T. Zewdu. Carbon sequestration potential of natural vegetation under grazing influence in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia: implication for climate change mitigation. Heliyon 5(8): e02329 (2019).

V. Luoma, N. Saarinen, M.A. Wulder, J.C. White, M. Vastaranta, M. Holopainen, and J. Hyyppä. Assessing precision in conventional field measurements of individual tree attributes. Forests, 8(2), 38 (2017).

I. S. Eneji, O. Obinna, and E.T. Azua. Sequestration and carbon storage potential of tropical forest reserve and tree species located within Benue State of Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection 2(2):157 (2014).

Y.N. Chi, J.S. Bardsley, and T.J. Bishop. Carbon Sequestration Assessment of Selected Campus Champion Trees. Journal of Forests 7(1): 9-17 (2020).

E.C. Toochi. Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2? Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal 2(3):148-150 (2018).

C. De Villiers, S. Chen, C. Jin and Y. Zhu. Carbon sequestered in the trees on a university campus: a case studyqu. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 5(2): 149-171 (2014).

L.J.R. Nunes, M.A.M. Raposo, C.I.R. Meireles, C.J. Pinto Gomes, and N.M.C. Almeida Ribeiro. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Forest Invasive Species: A Case Study with Acacia dealbata Link. Resources 10(5), 51 (2021).

K. Srinivas, and S. Sundarapandian. Biomass and carbon stocks of trees in tropical dry forest of East Godavari region, Andhra Pradesh, India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 3(2):114-122 (2019).

E.M. Carretero, G. Moreno, A. Duplancic, A. Abud, B. Vento, and A. J. Jauregui. Urban forest of Mendoza (Argentina): the role of Morus alba (Moraceae) in carbon storage. Carbon Management 8(3): 237-244 (2017).

D. Dugaya, S. Srirag, A. K. Pandey, A. Paul, D. D. Shukla, K. Deo, N. Sharma, S. Verma, S. Nagaria, S. Guhaprasad and P. Chaudhry. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Trees Planted Along Roadsides: A Case From Bhopal City, India. International Journal of Environment 9(2):104-119 (2020).

Z. He, H. Sun, Y. Peng, Z. Hu, Y. Cao and S.Y. Lee. Colonization by native species enhances the carbon storage capacity of exotic mangrove monocultures. Carbon Balance and Management 15 (2020).

L. Schwendenmann, and N.D. Mitchell. Carbon accumulation by native trees and soils in an urban park, Auckland. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 38(2): 213-220 (2014).

T. K. Baul, A. Chakraborty, R. Nandi, M. Mohiuddin, A. Kilpeläinen and T. Sultana. Effects of tree species diversity and stand structure on carbon stocks of homestead forests in Maheshkhali Island, Southern Bangladesh. Carbon Balance and Management 16 (2021).

K.B. Hulvey, R.J. Hobbs, R.J. Standish, D.B. Lindenmayer, L. Lach, and M.P. Perring. Benefits of tree mixes in carbon plantings. Nature Climate Change 3(10): 869-874 (2013).

Y. Li, H. Wu, J. Wang, L. Cui, D. Tian, J. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Yan, Z. Yan, K. Zhang, X. Kang, and B. Song. Plant biomass and soil organic carbon are main factors influencing dry-season ecosystem carbon rates in the coastal zone of the Yellow River Delta. PlOS One 14(1): e0210768 (2019).

G. Liu, and Z. Zhao. Analysis of carbon storage and its contributing factors—A case study in the Loess Plateau (China). Energies 11(6): 1596 (2018).

N. Wellbrock, E. Grüneberg, T. Riedel, and H. Polley. Carbon stocks in tree biomass and soils of German forests. Central European Forestry Journal 63: 105-112 (2017).

D.J. Mildrexler, L.T. Berner, B.E. Law, R.A. Birdsey, and W.R. Moomaw. Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3 (2020).

M. El Mderssa, B. Belghazi, H. Benjelloun, O. Zennouhi, L. Nassiri, and J. Ibijbijen. Estimation of Carbon Sequestration; Using Allometric Equations; in Azrou Cedar Forests (Cedrus atlantica Manetti) in the Central Middle Atlas of Morocco under Climate Change. Open Journal of Forestry 9(3) (2019).

I.E. Maren, and L.N. Sharma. Seeing the wood for the trees: Carbon storage and conservation in temperate forests of the Himalayas. Forest Ecology and Management 487 (2021).

R.T. Leverett, S.A. Masino, and W.R. Moomaw. Older Eastern White Pine Trees and Stands Accumulate Carbon for Many Decades and Maximize Cumulative Carbon. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4 (2021).

A. Ahmad, M. Amir, A. Mannan, S. Saeed, S. Shah, S. Ullah, R. Uddin and Q. Liu. The carbon sinks and mitigation potential of deodar (Cedrus deodara) forest ecosystem at different altitude in Kumrat Valley, Pakistan. Open Journal of Forestry 8(4): 553-566 (2018).

L. Zribi, H. Chaar, A. Khaldi, B. Henchi, F. Mouillot, and F. Gharbi. Estimate of biomass and carbon pools in disturbed and undisturbed oak forests in Tunisia. Forest systems 25(2): 4(2016).

N.L. Stephenson, A.J. Das, R. Condit, S.E. Russo, P.J. Baker, N.G. Beckman, ... and M. A. Zavala. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature 507(7490): 90-93 (2014).

G. Rodríguez-Loinaz, I. Amezaga, and M. Onaindia. Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. Journal of environmental management 120: 18-26 (2013).

A. Ajani, and Z. I. Shams. Comparative status of sequestered carbon stock of Azadirachta indica and Conocarpus erectus at the University of Karachi Campus, Pakistan. International Journal of Environment 5(2): 89-97 (2016).

L.M.A. Omoro, M. Starr, and P.K.E. Pellikka. Tree biomass and soil carbon stocks in indigenous forests in comparison to plantations of exotic species in the Taita Hills of Kenya. Silva Fennica 47(2) (2013).

H.K. Jo, H.M Park, and J.Y. Kim. Carbon offset service and design guideline of tree planting for multifamily residential sites in Korea. Sustainability 11(13): 2-14 (2019).

K.T. Siraj. Potential difference of tree species on carbon sequestration performance and role of forest based industry to the environment (Case of Arsi Forest Enterprise Gambo District). Environment Pollution and Climate Change 1(3): 2-10 (2017).

E.G. McPherson, and A. Kendall. A life cycle carbon dioxide inventory of the Million Trees Los Angeles program. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19(9): 1653-1665 (2014).

D.J. Nowak, E.J. Greenfield, R E. Hoehn, and E. Lapoint. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution 178: 229-236 (2013).

S.G. Hernandez, and S.W. Sheehan. Comparison of carbon sequestration efficacy between artificial photosynthetic carbon dioxide conversion and timberland reforestation. MRS Energy & Sustainability 7 (2020).

P. Nogia, G.K. Sidhu, R. Mehrotrae, and S. Mehrotra. Capturing atmospheric carbon: biological and nonbiological methods. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 11(2): 266-274 (2016).

Y. Tang, A. Chen, and S. Zhao. Carbon storage and sequestration of urban street trees in Beijing, China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4: 53 (2016).

I.N. Aini, H.S. Hasibuan, and Waryono. Escalating the small-sized community green spaces’ role as the carbon storage in the coastal town. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 623 (2021).

M.A. Besar, H. Suardi, M.H. Phua, D. James, M.B. Mokhtar, and M.F. Ahmed. Carbon stock and sequestration potential of an agroforestry system in Sabah, Malaysia. Forests 11(2): 210 (2020).

F. Scandellari, G. Caruso, G. Liguori, F. Meggio, A.M. Palese, D. Zanotelli, G. Celano, R. Gucci, P.Inglese, A. Pitacco, and M. Tagliavini. A survey of carbon sequestration potential of orchards and vineyards in Italy. European Journal of Horticulture Science 81(2): 106-114 (2016).

Capitalizing Trees for Carbon Sequestration as a Co-Benefit of Biophilic Urbanism