Frequency of Different Types of Endothelial Corneal Dystrophies by Age, Gender, and Visual Acuity in Punjab, Pakistan
Frequency of different types of endothelial corneal dystrophies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(59-1)670Keywords:
Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy, Frequency, Fuchs Endothelial Corneal dystrophy, Visual acuity, Cornea, Visual impairmentAbstract
Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (ECD) is, by definition, an endogenous degeneration that progresses slowly in the corneal endothelium as a result of genetic predisposition. A transverse study was conducted from September 2018 to June 2019, and the subjects affected with ECD were examined by visiting various city hospitals in Punjab including Sahiwal, Narowal, Okara, Gujranwala, Kasur, Lahore, and Multan. The basic objective of the current investigation was to find the frequency of different types of ECD in the population of different cities in Punjab. Data was collected based on relevant parameters such as age, gender, and visual acuity. The visual acuity was assessed by ophthalmologists via Snellen chart and Visual acuity test. Among 3000 patients, 6.6 % (n=198) cases of ECD were recognized which includes more males 52.52 % (n=104) as compared to females 47.48 % (n=94). Maximum cases of ECD 31.82 % (n=63) were observed in the 41-50 years of age group. In all types of ECD, FECD was observed most abundant with 38.38 % (n=76) and XECD with the least abundance of 6.67 % (n=13). The frequency of CHED and PPCD was 25.25 % (n=50) and 29.79 % (n=59) respectively. The results of recent research finalize that endothelial corneal dystrophy is a rare disease prevailing in Pakistan with a proportion of only 6.6 %. This study benefits in updating the data about the frequency of endothelial corneal dystrophy in Pakistan. Careful clinical evaluation, initial diagnosis, genetic counseling, genotyping, and correct treatment are necessary for the restoration of vision loss due to ECD.
References
M.S. Sridhar. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 66:190-4 (2018).
A. Nowińska, E. Chlasta-Twardzik, M. Dembski, E. Wróblewska-Czajka, K. Ulfik-Dembska, and E. Wylęgała. Detailed corneal and genetic characteristics of a pediatric patient with macular corneal dystrophy-case report. BMC Ophthalmology 21(1): 1-9 (2021).
J.L. Bourges. Corneal dystrophies. Journal francais d’ophtalmologie 40(6): e177-e192 (2017).
M. Shah, M. Khan, M.T. Khan, M.Y. Khan, and N. Saeed. Causes of visual impairment in children with low vision. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 21(2): 88-92 (2011).
D.C. Musch, L.M. Niziol, J.D. Stein, R.M. Kamyar, and A. Sugar. Prevalence of corneal dystrophies in the United States: estimates from claims data. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 52(9): 6959-6963 (2011).
V. Lamm, H. Hara, A. Mammen, D. Dhaliwal, and D.K. Cooper. Corneal blindness and xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 21(2): 99-114 (2014).
I. Sohail, F. Noreen, S. Nawaz, S. Ahmed, H. Zafar, and M. Niaz. Frequency of corneal dystrophies on the basis of histopathology in surgically removed corneas. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 65(10): 1056-1059 (2015).
N. Bhatti, M.U. Fawad, M. Hussain, and M.U. Qidwai. Three years clinical audit of patients presenting in cornea clinic at a tertiary Care. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology 27(4): (2011).
T. Yamaguchi, E. Shimizu, Y. Yagi-Yaguchi, D. Tomida, Y. Satake, and J. Shimazaki. A novel entity of corneal diseases with irregular posterior corneal surfaces: concept and clinical relevance. Cornea 36: S53-S59 (2017).
G.K. Klintworth. Corneal dystrophies. Orphanet journal of rare diseases 4(1): 1-38 (2009).
J.S. Weiss, H.U. Møller, A.J. Aldave, B. Seitz, C. Bredrup, T. Kivelä, and W. Lisch. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies-edition 2. Cornea 34(2): 117- 159 (2015).
S. Feizi. Corneal endothelial cell dysfunction: etiologies and management. Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology 10: 2515841418815802 (2018).
R. Verma, A. Bhatnagar, B. Vasudevan, and S. Kumar. Keratosis follicularis spinulosa decalvans. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 82(2): 214-6 (2016).
G.G. Nanda, and D.P. Alone. Current understanding of the pathogenesis of Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Molecular vision 25: 295 (2019).
H. Elhalis, B. Azizi, and U.V. Jurkunas. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. The ocular surface 8(4): 173-184 (2010).
S. Chaurasia, R. Mittal, G. Bichappa, M. Ramappa, and S.I. Murthy. Clinical characterization of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in patients of Indian ethnicity. International ophthalmology 37(4): 945-952 (2017).
Z.N. Lin, J. Chen, and H.P. Cui. Characteristics of corneal dystrophies: a review from clinical, histological and genetic perspectives. International journal of ophthalmology 9(6): 904 (2016).
V. Mittal, N. Sehdev, and R. Mittal. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy: Initial Experiences. Cornea 40(8), pp.972-976 (2021).
B. Hemadevi, N.V. Prajna, M. Srinivasan, and P. Sundaresan. Genetic Perspective of Corneal Endothelial Dystrophies. JSM Genetics & Genomics 4(2): 1026 (2017).
S.P. Patel, P.A. Gianfagna, T.E. Ruster, and A.E. Millen. Prevalence of Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy by age and sex. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 59(9): 3774-3774 (2018).
I. Sohail, F. Noreen. S. Nawaz, S. Ahmed, H. Zafar, and M. Niaz. Frequency of corneal dystrophies on the basis of histopathology in surgically removed corneas. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 65(10): 1056-1059 (2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY). Allows users to: copy the article and distribute; abstracts, create extracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.