Distribution and damage potential of pulse beetles, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Sindh, Pakistan

Callosobruchus spp. status and damage in Sindh, Pakistan

Authors

  • Adeel Aslam Perzada
  • Arfan Ahmed Gilal Department of Entomology
  • Lubna Bashir
  • Jam Ghulam Murtaza Sahito
  • Muhammad Ibrahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(59-3)716

Keywords:

Beetles, Callosobruchus, Damage, Distribution, Population, Stored grains

Abstract

Callosobruchus spp. are global serious pests of pulses. Therefore, two studies were carried out to determine their distribution in three ecological zones of the Sindh, Pakistan along with their damage potential to major pulses. Survey was conducted from Zone-one (Ghotki, Sukkur and Larkana districts), Zone-two (Hyderabad, Mirpur Khas and Shaheed Benazirabad districts) and Zone-three (Karachi district) during March – April 2020. Grain samples of main pulses i.e., chickpea (channa), field pea (matar), cowpea (lobia), green lentil (moong) and daal channa were collected from three locations of each district and brought to Stored Grain Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Crop Protection, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam for further examination. Three pulse beetle species i.e., C. maculatus, C. chinensis and C. analis were identified from the collected pulse samples as the highest populations of adults, eggs, grubs and pupae was recorded from moong, followed by lobia and gram. No population of pulse beetle was recorded from daal channa and matar. Callosobruchus maculatus was the most dominant species at all sampling as higher beetle populations were recorded from Mirpur Khas and Sukkur districts. Therefore, both these strains were further evaluated for their feeding preference and weight loss assessment on various pulses i.e., gram (chickpea), lobia (cowpea), moong (green gram) and daal channa (yellow lentil) in no-choice under laboratory conditions. C. maculatus showed a significant feeding preference among pulses with lobia and gram being the most preferred, whereas daal channa was the least preferred, hence suffered highest and lowest weight loss, respectively. Therefore, proper storage and quarantine measures are suggested to be taken in the transportation and storage of pulses to restrict the spread and damage of pulse beetles.

References

S. Chakraborty and P. Mondal. Physico-chemical parameters of pulses affecting the bruchid (Callosobruchus chinensis Linn.) Infestation. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 7(3), 2554-2560 (2016).

F. Deeba, M. Sarwar, and R.D. Khuhruo. Varietal susceptibility of Mungbean Genotypes to Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 38: 265-268 (2006).

FAO, 2018 Corporate Document Repository, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/Q2585E/Q2585E03.html (Accessed 18 February 2021).

D. Murrell. Global research and funding survey on pulse productivity and sustainability. Global Pulse Confederation, Dubai.

(2016) http://www.pgro.org/downloads/PulsesGlobalResearchandFundingSurvey_2016_final.pdf (Accessed 26 February 2020).

GoP. Summary of area, production and yield of agricultural commodities. Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan 2018-19, Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Government of Pakistan. (2021). http://www.mnfsr.gov.pk/frmDetails.aspx / (Accessed 1 April 2022)

A. Haider, and M. Zaidi. 2017. Food Consumption Patterns and Nutrition Disparity in Pakistan. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. P. No. 83522. (2017). https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/83522/ (Accessed 18 February 2021).

A.H. Gabriel, and B. Hundie. Farmers postharvest grain management choices under liquidity constraints and impending risks: Implications for achieving food security objectives in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the International Association Of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 12-18, Gold Cost, Australia. (2006)

B.M. Thompson, and G.V.P. Reddy. Effect of temperature on two bio-insecticides for the control of Callosobruchus spp. status and damage in Sindh, Pakistan 19 confused flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Florida Entomologist 99: 67-71 (2016).

S. Nichimbi-Msolla, and R.N. Misangu. Seasonal distribution of common bean bruchid species in selected areas in Tanzania. Proceedings of the Bean Seed Workshop, Arusha, Tanzania, 12–14 January 2001. Bean/Cowpea Collaborative Research

Support Program–East Africa., pp. 5. (2002).

S.N. Mishra, B.C. Jena, and B.C. Guru. Biology of Pulse Beetle Callosobruchus chinensis in Storage Condition in Green Gram. International Journal of Science and Research 4(8): 1321-1323 (2015).

Beck, C.W. and L.S. Blumer. A handbook on bean beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. Atlanta: Emory University and Morehouse College. (2014). http://beanbeetles.org/handbook/handbook.pdf (Accessed 10 February 2021).

I.K. Baruah, D. Panda, M.V. Jagadale, D.J. Das, S. Acharjee, P. Sen, and B.K. Sarmah. Bruchid egg induced transcript dynamics in developing seeds of black gram (Vigna mungo). (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176337 (Accessed 15

January 2022).

A. Togola, P.A. Seck, I.A. Glitho, A. Diagne, and C. Adda. Economic Losses from Insect Pests Infestation on rice Stored on farm in Benin. Journal of Applied Sciences 13(2): 278- 285 (2013).

B.J. Southgate, R.W. Howe, and G.A. Brett. The specific status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis (F.). Bulletin of Entomological Research 48(1): 79-89 (1957).

Devi, M.B. and N.V. Devi. 2014. Life Cycle and Morphometric Measurement of Callosobruchus analis on Gram. Biological Forum 6(2): 86-89 (2014).

S.M. Fatima, A. Usman, K. Sohail, M. Afzaal, B. Shah, M. Adnan, N. Ahmed, K. Junaid, S.R.A. Shah, and I. Rehman. Rearing and identification of Callosobruchus maculatus (Bruchidae: Coleoptera) in Chickpea. Journal of Entomological and Zoological Studies 4(2): 264-266 (2016).

L.J. Manson, and J. Obermeyer. Stored Grain Insect Pest Management. Purdue Extension E – 66 – W, 5pp (2010).

M. Suleiman. 2016. Insect pest’s infestation of three stored grains in some markets of Katsina Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Zoological and Bioscience Research 3, 15-19 (2016).

C.W. Beck, and L.S. Blumer. A handbook on bean beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. National Science Foundation. (2014). URL: http://www. beanbeetles. org/handbook. pdf (last accessed 16 June 2022).

R. Vasudeva. The influence of developmental temperature on sperm form and function in Callosobruchus maculatus. PhD. University of Lincoln (2014).

R. Maharjan, J. Ahn, C. Park, Y. Yoon, Y. Jang, H. Kang, and S. Bae. Effects of temperature on development of the azuki bean weevil,

Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on two leguminous seeds. Journal of Stored Products Research 72: 90-99 (2017).

A. Charles, O. Midega, A. Alice, W. Murage, and B. Jimmy. Managing storage pests of maize: Farmers’ knowledge, perceptions and practices in western Kenya. Crop Protection 90: 142-149 (2016).

I.H. Lawal, Ibrahim, I. Iro, A.Y. Yaroson, and J.A. Idris. Efficacy of Selected Botanicals against Cowpea Weevils (Callosobruchus maculatus F.) on stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 8(10): 345-370 (2018).

M.A.Q. Sulehrie, P. Golob, B.M.D. Tran, and G. Farrell. The effect of attributes of Vigna spp. on the bionomics of Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata106(3): 159-168 (2003).

F.A. Tali, A. Manzar, M.J. Ahmad, and I. Khan. Comparative resistance of mungbean genotypes against pulse beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) under temperate condition of Kashmir valley. Journal of Entomological Zoological Studies 7(5): 51-58 (2019)

K. Tripathi, T.V. Prasad, R. Bhardwaj, S.K. Jha, D.P. Semwal, P.G. Gore, ... and S. Bhalla. Evaluation of diverse germplasm of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] against bruchid [Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.)] and correlation with physical and biochemical parameters of seed. Plant Genetic Resources18(3), 120-129 (2020).

S. Ahmed, A. Haque, H. Mahmud, and K.M. Khalequzzaman. Egg deposition and weight loss of seeds by pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. on different genotypes of pulses. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 44(3): 513-524

(2019).

S. Ahmad, A. Haque, and H. Mahmud. Effect of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L on oviposition and damage in some important genotypes of pulse crops in Bangladesh. Biomedical Journal 2, 5 20 Perzada et al (2018). DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.02.000739

F. Bidar, J. Razmjou, A. Golizadeh, S.A.A., Fathi, A. Ebadollahi, and B. Naseri. Effect of different legume seeds on life table parameters of cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 90: 101755 (2021)

Downloads

Published

2022-09-23

How to Cite

Perzada, A. A., Gilal, A. A., Lubna Bashir, Sahito, J. G. M., & Kubar, D. M. I. (2022). Distribution and damage potential of pulse beetles, Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Sindh, Pakistan: Callosobruchus spp. status and damage in Sindh, Pakistan. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 59(3), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(59-3)716

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.