Assessing Public Opinion Regarding COVID-19 Vaccinations in Pakistan: Knowledge, and Perceptions of General Public
Opinion Regarding COVID-19 Vaccinations in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(58-3)668Keywords:
COVID-19, vaccination, survey, perception, demography, willingness, infodemicsAbstract
The COVID-19 infodemic can be counteracted by clear and consistent communication of scientific evidence and improved health literacy between the public and informants. For complete eradication of COVID-19, several vaccines are approved in various countries for public use by regulatory authorities. Assessing public perception regarding COVID-19 vaccination is an important area of research. In the current study, we aim to evaluate the opinions of individuals from multiple localities about COVID-19 and its vaccination through an online survey. Participants of the study were divided into different groups based on age, profession, demography, and income, and their opinions were calculated in percentage. In age group analysis we reported the highest willingness, 62.8 % (n=22) in age group 30-40, followed by 60 % (n=3) in age group >50, 58.6 % (n=244) in age group 20-30, 57.95 % (n=51) was in age group 15-20 and the least willingness, 33.33 % (n=4) in age group 40-50. The highest disagreement regarding vaccination of 60 % was found in age group >50, followed by 33.3 % in the age group 40-50, 14.7 % in the age group 20-30, 11.4 % in the age group 15-20 and 30-40. Similarly based on profession, maximum acceptability, 59.1 % (n=262) was reported in students, followed by a businessman (68.7 %, n=11), professional workers (3.5 %, n=20). Likewise, in demographic analysis, individuals from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) (61.3 %, n=200) were found more enthusiastic for vaccination, followed by AJK (58.33 %, n=7) and Islamabad (58.1 %, n=32). In the same way, people with income range $435 - $621/month showed the highest willingness (65.7 %, n=69) regarding vaccination, followed by income group ($621 or more $s/month). Surprisingly, individuals from the low-income group were found more interested in vaccination as compared to the higher-income group. Comparatively low interest of high-income group individuals may be due to more exposure to conspiracy theories shared on social media.
References
WHO. World Health Organization coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. World Health Organization (2020)
P. Qiu, Y. Zhou, F. Wang, H. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Pan, and J. Liu. Clinical characteristics, laboratory outcome characteristics, comorbidities, and complications of related COVID-19 deceased: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 1-10 (2020).
G. Onder, G. Rezza, and S. Brusaferro. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. Jama 323(18) 1775-1776 (2020).
K.A. Fisher, S.J. Bloomstone, J. Walder, S. Crawford, H. Fouayzi, and K.M. Mazor. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a survey of US adults. Annals of Internal Medicine 173(12): 964-973 (2020).
A.J. Rodriguez-Morales, J. A. Cardona-Ospina, E. Gutiérrez-Ocampo, R. Villamizar-Peña, Y. Holguin-Rivera, J. P. Escalera-Antezana, and R. Sah. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 34, 101623 (2020).
F.J. Jirjees, Y.H.D. Bashi, and H.J. Al-Obaidi, COVID-19 death and BCG vaccination programs worldwide. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 84(1): 13 (2021).
N. Lurie, M. Saville, R. Hatchett, and J. Halton. Developing Covid-19 vaccines at pandemic speed. New England Journal of Medicine 382(21):1969- 1973 (2020).
F.A. Rathore, and F. Farooq, Information overload and infodemic in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 70 (suppl 3): S162-S165 (2020).
G.E. Calabrò, A. Tognetto, E. Carini, S. Mancinelli, L Sarnari, V. Colamesta, and C. de Waure. Strategies to Improve Vaccination among At-Risk Adults and the Elderly in Italy. Vaccines 8(3): 358 (2020).
J. Hua, and R Shaw, Corona Virus (COVID-19) “Infodemic” and Emerging Issues through a Data Lens: The Case of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(7): 2309 (2020).
A.P. Isiko, Religious construction of disease: An exploratory appraisal of religious responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda. Journal of African Studies and Development 12(3): 77-96 (2020).
A. Waris, U.K. Atta, M. Ali, A. Asmat, and A.J.N.M. Baset. COVID-19 outbreak: current scenario of Pakistan. New Microbes and New Infections 35: 100681 (2020).
K. Abid, Y. A. Bari, M. Younas, S. Tahir Javaid, and A. Imran. Progress of COVID-19 Epidemic in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 32(4): 154-156 (2020).
M. Shafi, J. Liu, and W. Ren, Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized Enterprises operating in Pakistan. Research in Globalization 2: 100018 (2020).
I. Ali. Impact of COVID-19 on vaccination programs: adverse or positive? Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 16(11): 2594-2600 (2020).
K. Hayat, M. Rosenthal, S. Xu, M. Arshed, P. Li, P. Zhai, and Y. Fang. View of Pakistani residents toward coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during a rapid outbreak: a rapid online survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(10): 3347 (2020).
N. Noreen, S. Dil, S. Niazi, I. Naveed, N. Khan, F. Khan, and D. Kumar. COVID 19 pandemic & Pakistan; limitations and gaps. Global Biosecurity 1(4) (2020).
M.K. Anser, Z. Yousaf, M.A. Khan, A.A. Nassani, M.M.Q. Abro, X.H. Vo, and K. Zaman. Social and administrative issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan: better late than never. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(27): 34567-34573 (2020).
T.T. Le, Z. Andreadakis, A. Kumar, R.G. Román, S. Tollefsen, M. Saville, and S. Mayhew. The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 19(5): 305-306 (2020).
M. Ittefaq, S.A. Hussain, and M. Fatima. COVID-19 and social-politics of medical misinformation on social media in Pakistan. Media Asia 47(1-2): 75-80 (2020).
S.B. Naeem, and R. Bhatti. The Covid‐19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal 37(3): 233-239 (2020).
M.S. Islam, T. Sarkar, S. H. Khan, A.H.M. Kamal, S.M. Hasan, A. Kabir, D. Yeasmin, M.A. Islam, 23. J. Wang, R. Jing, X. Lai, H. Zhang, Y. Lyu, M. D. Knol, and H. Fang. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Vaccines 8(3): 482 (2020).
K. Pogue, J.L. Jensen, C.K. Stancil, D.G. Ferguson, S.J. Hughes, E.J. Mello, and B. D. Poole. Influences on attitudes regarding potential COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. Vaccines, 8(4), 582 (2020).
A.A. Malik, S.M. McFadden, J. Elharake, and S.B. Omer. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine 26: 100495 (2020).
J.V. Lazarus, S.C. Ratzan, A. Palayew, L. O. Gostin, H. J. Larson, K. Rabin, and A. El-Mohandes. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine 27(2): 225-228 (2021).
S. Kreps, S. Prasad, J.S. Brownstein, Y. Hswen, B.T. Garibaldi, B. Zhang, and D.L. Kriner. Factors associated with US adults’ likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA Network Open 3(10): e2025594-e2025594 (2020).
K.I.A. Chowdhury, K. S. Anwar, A.A. Chughtai, and H. Seale. COVID-19–related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103(4): 1621 (2020).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY). Allows users to: copy the article and distribute; abstracts, create extracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.