Nutrient Dynamics in Cotton Leaf Tissues as Affected by Zinc Fertilization and Ontogeny
Nutrient Dynamics in Cotton Leaf Tissues
Keywords:
Cotton, leaf, micronutrients, macronutrients, nutrient dynamicsAbstract
Plant-tissue analyses are performed to assess plant nutrient status, and to determine fertilizer requirements of the current and the future crop grown in the field. Application of zinc (Zn) fertilizer may increase or decrease levels of other nutrients in the crop plants. Field experiments were conducted during 2004 and 2005 to study the effect of Zn fertilization on nutrient concentrations in leaf-tissues of cotton plants at different growth stages. Five rates of Zn (i.e., 0.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 and 12.5 kg Zn ha−1) were applied as ZnSO4·7H2O, in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. All plots were uniformy supplied (in kg ha-1) with 150 nitrogen (N) as urea, 60 phosphorus (P) as triple superphosphate, 50 potassium (K) as potassium sulfate and 1.0 B as borax. Most recent fully expanded leaves (without petioles) from the main stems were sampled 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 days after planting of the crop and the plant tissues were analyzed for N, P, K, calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), Zn, iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu). Concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu and P in leaves decreased significantly with Zn application indicating that optimum levels of these nutrients must also be maintained along with Zn application especially under marginal levels of these nutrients in soils. Leaf concentrations of the studied macro- and micro-nutrients, except K, increased with advancement of plant growth up to 60 days after sowing and then decreased gradualy. Observed concentrations of nutrients in cotton leaves at different critical stages will help in focusing future research aimed at defining critical nutrient concentrations at different stages of cotton.
References
Rashid, A. & J. Ryan. Micronutrient constraints to crop production in soils with Mediterranean type characteristics: A Review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 27: 959–975 (2004).
Rashid, A. Establishment and management of micronutrient deficiencies in soils of Pakistan: A review. Soil and Environment 24: 1-22 (2005).
Drossopoulos, J.B., D.L. Bouranis & B.D. Bairakatari. Patterns of mineral fluctuations in soybean leaves in relation to their position. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17: 1017–1035 (1994).
Fernández-Escobar, R.., R. Moreno & M. GarcíaCreus. Seasonal changes of mineral nutrients in olive leaves during the alternate-bearing cycle. Scientia Horticulturae 82: 25–45 (1999).
Lim, T.K., L. luders & M. Poffley. Seasonal changes in durian leaf and soil mineral element content. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22: 657–667 (1999).
Zhao, D. & D.M. Oosterhuis. Photosynthetic capacity and carbon contribution of leaves and bracts to developing floral buds in cotton. Photosynthetica 36: 279–290 (1999).
Fageria, N.K. The Use of Nutrients in Crop Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2208).
Sorensen, N.J. Ontogenetic Changes in macro nutrient composition of leaf-vegetable Crops in relation to plant nitrogen status: A review. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production 6: 75–96 (2000).
Clark, R.B. Mineral element composition of corn plant parts with age. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 6: 451–464 (1975).
Miller, R.D. & R.K. Smith. Influence of boron on other chemical elements in alfalfa. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 8: 465–478 (1977).
Welch, R.M. 1995. Micronutrient nutrition of plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 14: 49–82 12. Mullins, G.L. & C.H. Burmester. Dry matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium accumulation by four cotton varieties. Agronomy Journal 82:729– 736 (1991).
Mullins, G.L. & C.H. Burmester. Uptake of calcium and magnesium by cotton grown under dryland conditions. Agronomy Journal 84: 564–569(1992).
Ryan, J., G. Estefan & A. Rashid. Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. International Center for Agricultural Research the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Allepo, Syria (2001).
Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 8th ed. United States Department of Agriculture, National Sources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA (1998).
Ahmed, N., M. Abid & A. Rashid. Zinc fertilization impact on irrigated cotton grown in an Aridisol: Growth, productivity, fiber quality, oil quality. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 41: 1627–1643 (2010).
Rashid, A. & E. Rafique. Boron deficiency in cotton grown in calcareous soils of Pakistan. II. Correction and criteria for foliar diagnosis. In: Boron in Plant and Animal Nutrition. Goldbach, H.E., P.H. Brown, B. Rerkasem, T. Thellier, M.A. Wimmer & R.W. Bell (Ed.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY, USA (2002).
Gaines, T.P. & G.A. Mitchell. Boron determination in plant tissue by the azomethine-H method. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 10: 1099–1108 (1979).
Anonymous. User’s Guide: A Microcomputer Program for the Design Management and Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA (1986).
Fageria, V.D. Nutrient interactions in crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24: 1269–1290 (2001).
Rochester, I. Nutripak. Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre, Narrabri, Australia (2001).
Thompson, A., H.C. Lane, J.W. Jones & J.D. Heshketh. Nitrogen concentrations of cotton leaves, buds, and bolls in relation to age and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal 68: 617– 621 (1976).
Zhu, B. & D.M. Oosterhuis. Nitrogen distribution within a sympodial branch of cotton. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15: 1–14 (1992). 24. Li, J., M. Zhou, M. Pessarkli & J.L. Storehlein. Cotton response to zinc fertilizer. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 22: 1689–1699 (1991).
Fritschi, F.B., B.A. Roberts, D.W. Rains, R.L. Travis & R.B. Hutmacher. Fate of nitrogen-15 applied to irrigated Acala and Pima cotton. Agronomy Journal 96: 646–655 (2004).
Rominger, R.S., D. Smith & L.A. Peterson. Changes in elemental concentrations in alfalfa herbage at two soil fertility levels with advance in maturity. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 6: 163–180 (1975).
Terman, G.L. Yield nutrient concentration relationships in maize. In: Proceedings of 7th International Colloquium on Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems 2: 447–458 (1974).
Sabbe, W.E. & S.C. Hodges. Interpretation of plant mineral status. p. 265–270.In: Stewart, J.M. et al. (Ed.). Physiology of Cotton. Springer, Dordrecht (2010).
Oosterhuis, D.M., J. Chipamaunga & G.C. Bate. Nitrogen uptake of field grown cotton. I. Distribution in plant components in relation to fertilization and yield. Experimental Agriculture 19: 91–101(1983).
Brar, M.S. & G.S. Sekhon. Leaf analysis as a guide to the nutritional status of cotton grown in Punjab. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 2: 12–17(1998).
Weir, R.G. & G.C. Cresswell. Plant Nutrient Disorder. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia (1994). 32. Mullins, G.L. & C.H. Burmester. Accumulation of copper, iron, manganese and zinc by four cotton cultivars. Field Crops Research 32: 129–140 (1993).
Sabbe, W.E., J.L. Keogh, R. Maples & L.H. Hilman. Nutrient analysis of Arkansas cotton and soybean leaf tissue. Arkansas Farm Research 21: 2 (1972).
Hussain, S., Z. Rengel, S.A. Mohammadi, A. Ebadi-Sagharloo & M.A. Maqsood. Mapping QTL associated with remobilization of zinc from vegetative tissues into grains of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Plant and Soil 399: 193–208 (2016).
Fageria, N.K., V.C. Baligar & C.A. Jones. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops. Marcel Dekker, NY, USA (1996).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY). Allows users to: copy the article and distribute; abstracts, create extracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.