Behavior of Camel Browsing Maintained on Vegetation at Desert, Irrigated and Costal Zones of Sindh-Pakistan
Surveillance and Preference of Camel Browse Vegetation
Keywords:
Browsing, Nutrient, Preference, Surveillance, VegetationAbstract
Present research focused three major districts viz Mithi, Tando Allahyar and Thatta from Desert, Irrigated and Coastal zones of Sindh Province of Pakistan during the year 2018. Study was subjected to screen and assess the preference pattern of the camel browse vegetations surrounding the study area. Results of present study indicated a total of 16 natural vegetations at Mithi, 16 at Tando Allahyar and 19 at Thatta which were found to be available forbrowsing by the camels. Further, results reveled Senegalia senegal the most preferred vegetation followed by Cordia sinensis (Linn.), Salvadora oleiodes, and Ziziphus nummularia while, Prosopis juliflora appeared less preferred (p<0.05) followed by Calligonum polygonoides, Orthanthera viminea and Prosopis cineraria at district Mithi. At Tando Allahyar district camel preferred (p<0.05) more to browse the Salvadora oleiodes followed by Suaeda fruticosa, Haloxylon salicornicum and Acacia nilotica and less the Prosopis juliflora, while Tamarix passerinoides followed by Mudhari Tribulus terrestris and Melilotus parviflora were moderately preferred by camels. Further results showed that the Cordia sinensis (Linn.) (p<0.05) was browsed more by camels at Thatta followed by Salvadora oleiodes, Suaeda fruticosa, Haloxylon salicornicum and Prosopis juliflora preferred less. However, Alhagi maurorum, R.mucronata and Timar Avicenia officinalis are preferred by camels at intermediate level. Study concludes that the coastal zone possess significantly ((p<0.05) higher number of natural vagetations for camel browsing comparatively desert and irrigated zones. Senegalia Senegal, Salvadora oleiodes, Cordia sinensis (Linn.) are the most favorite vegetations for camel at all zones but the Prosopis juliflora is less preferred.
References
Ali, H.A.M., A.B.O. Ismail, M. Fatur, F.A. Ahmed & M.E.E. Ahmed. Nutritional Evaluation and Palatability of Major Range Forbs from South Darfur, Sudan. Open Journal of Animal Science 6: 442-448 (2016).
Ahmad, S., M. Yaqoob, N. Hashmi, M. Zaman & M. Tariq. Economic importance of camel: Unique alternative under crisis. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 30: 191-197 (2010).
Mengli, Z., W.D. Willms, H. Guodong & J. Ye. Bactrian camel foraging behavior in a Haloxylon ammodendron (CA Mey) desert of Inner Mongolia. Applied Animal Behavioral Science 99: 330-343 (2006).
Towhidi, A & M. Zhandi. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and palatability of nine plant species for dromedary camels in the province of Semnan, Iran. Egyptian Journal of Biology 9: 47-52 (2007).
Wilson, R. T. The nutritional requirements of camel.” In Ouargla (Algeria) and CIHEAM-IAMZ (1988-89).
Surveillance and Preference of Camel Browse Vegetation 6.
Noor, I.M. A description of the pastoral camel production system in Moyale District, Kenya. MSc. Thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya (2013).
Kuria, S.G., I.A. Tura, S. Amboga & H.K. Walaga. Forage species preferred by camels (Camelus dromedarius) and their nutritional composition in North Eastern Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24:628-636 (2010).
Abdullah, M., M. Rafay, N. Sial, F. Rasheed, M. F. Nawaz, W. Nouman, I. Ahmad, T. Ruby & S. Khalil. Determination of forage productivity, carrying capacity and palatability of browse vegetation in arid rangelands of cholistan desert (Pakistan). Applied Ecology and Environment Research 15: 623-637 (2017).
Abdullah, M., M. Rafay, T. Hussain, H. Ahmad, U. Tahir, F. Rasheed, T. Ruby & S. Khalil. Nutritive potential and palatability preference of browse foliage by livestock in arid rangelands of cholistan desert (Pakistan). Journal of Animal and Plant Science 27: 1656-1664 (2015).
Alkali, H.A., B.F. Muhammad, A.A. Njidda, M. Abubakar & M.I. Ghude. Relative forage preference by camel (Camelus dromedarius) as influenced by season, sex and age in the Sahel zone of north western Nigeria. African Journal of Agriculture Research 12:1-5 (2017).
El-Keblawy, A., T. Ksiksi, and H.E Alqamy. Camel grazing affects species diversity and community structure in the deserts of the UAE. Journal of Arid Environments 73:347-354 (2009).
Schwartz, H.J., S. Wolfgang & L. Isaac. Feeding preferences of one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) on a semi-arid thornbush savannah in East Africa - adaptive advantages in view of increasing aridity of the environment, Third International Conference of the Society of Camelid Research (ISOCARD), Muskat, Oman (2012).
Dereje, M & P. Udén. The browsing dromedary camel: I. Behavior, plant preference and quality of forage selected. Animal Feed Science and Technology 121: 297-308 (2005).
Birhane, E., M. Balehegn, D. Kiros & D. Tsegaye. Distribution, animal preference and nutritive value of browse species in the Rangelands of Afar, northern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Biological Science 13:135-148 (2014).
Quraishi, M., A. Rasool & M. Iqbal. Range Management in Pakistan. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (1993).
Margaret, M.P.S and M. Wadhwa. Evaluation of forest tree leaves of semi-hilly arid region as livestock feed. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 17:777-783 (2012).
Iqbal, A. A socio-economic profile of camels in Pakistan with special emphasis on management and production aspects. Proc. International Workshop on Camel Research and Development. Wad Medani, Gezira State, Sudan:45-50 (2002).
Chaudhary, S.A & H.N.L. Houérou. The rangelands of the Arabian Peninsula. Science et changements planétaires/Sécheresse 17: 179-194 (2006)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY). Allows users to: copy the article and distribute; abstracts, create extracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.