Comparative Effect of Honey and Antibiotics against Multi Drug Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Surgical Site Infection

Authors

  • Syeda Rahmat Bibi Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Zobia Afsheen Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Hamza Iftikhar Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan
  • Ranra Jalal Department of Weed Sciences and Botany, University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Saad Jan Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan
  • Syed Majid Rasheed Department of Agriculture, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(60-4)850

Keywords:

Surgical Site Infection, Antibiotics, Acacia, Ziziphus, Bacterial Isolates

Abstract

Patients undergoing surgery are predominantly exposed to surgical site infections (SSI) resulting in serious consequences. A cross-sectional study comprising 100 samples, was collected from various surgical sites of admitted and non-admitted patients in Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. 87 samples were tested positive for bacterial growth. After isolation and identification, the highest prevalence was recorded among isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 38 (43.6%) followed by Pseudomonas sp. 25 (28.7%), Streptococcus pyogenes 13 (14.9%) and E. coli 11 (12.6%). Antibiogram pattern was determined which showed high sensitivity of all bacterial isolates toward Clindamycin, Clarithromycin, and Piperacillin, followed by Erythromycin, Doxycycline, Co-amoxiclav, while maximum number of isolates showed resistance against Vancomycin, Ciprofloxacin, Amikacin.  According to quantitative analysis, Ziziphus and Acacia honey inhibited E. coli at different Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). The results revealed that Ziziphus honey inhibited E.coli, at 100 µl concentration on the lowest MIC at 0.25 µl while Acacia honey inhibited E.coli at 75 µl concentration on lowest MIC at 0.5 µl. Ziziphus honey inhibited Pseudomonas sp. at 100 µl concentration on lowest MIC at 0.25 µl while Acacia honey inhibited Pseudomonas at 100 and 75 µl concentration on lowest MIC at 1 µl. Ziziphus honey also inhibited Staphylococcus aureus at 100 and 75 µl concentration on lowest MIC at 0.25 µl, while Acacia honey inhibited S. aureus at 100µl concentration on lowest MIC at 0.5 µl. This study concludes that Ziziphus honey was more effective in curing surgical wounds compared with Acacia honey. However, further Studies needed to be done for Ziziphus honey to utilize it as an efficient treatment approach.

References

Health: Surgical site infections. John Hopkins Medicine (2023). https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/surgical-site-infections (accessed November 2023).

S.P. Bebko, D.M. Green, and S.S. Awad. Effect of a preoperative decontamination protocol on surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation. JAMA Surgery 150(5): 390-395 (2015).

O.A. Olowe, Y.K. Ibrahim, B.O. Olayinka, and J. Ehinmidu. Epidemiology of surgical site infections in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Niger Postgraduate Medical Journal 26(3): 143 (2019).

R.P. Merkow, M.H. Ju, J.W. Chung, B.L. Hall, M.E. Cohen, M.V. Williams, T.C. Tsai, C.Y. Ko, and K.Y. Bilimoria. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 313(5): 483-95 (2015).

S. Pal, A. Sayana, A. Joshi, and D. Juyal. Staphylococcus aureus: A predominant cause of surgical site infections in a rural healthcare setup of Uttarakhand. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 8(11): 3600-3606 (2019).

P.M. Mertz, and L.G. Ovington. Wound healing microbiology. Dermatologic Clinics 11(4): 739-747 (2017).

F. Sattar, Z. Sattar, M. Zaman, and S. Akbar. Frequency of post-operative surgical site infections in a Tertiary care hospital in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Cureus 11: 42-43 (2019).

J. Seidelma, A. Baker, S. Lewis, S. Advani, B. Smith, and D. Anderson. Surgical site infection trends in community hospitals from 2013 to 2018. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 44(4): 610-615 (2022).

K.A. Ban, J.P. Minei, C. Laronga, B.G. Harbrecht, E.H. Jensen, D.E. Fry, K.M. Itani, P.E. Dellinger, C.Y. Co, and T.M. Duane. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 224(1): 59-74 (2017).

E. Ksiezopolska, and T. Gabaldon. Evolutionary Emergence of Drug Resistance in Candida Opportunistic Pathogens. Genes 9(9): 461 (2018).

H.K.R. Nair, N. Tatavilis, I. Pospíšilová, J. Kučerová, and N.A.J. Cremers. Medical-Grade Honey Kills Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Prevents Amputation in Diabetics with Infected Ulcers: A Prospective Case Series. Antibiotics 9(9): 529 (2020).

L. Labban. Honey as a promising treatment for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). Journal of Medical Society 28(2): 64-68 (2014).

A.B. Jull, N. Cullum, J.C. Dumville, M.J. Westby, S. Deshpande, and N. Walker. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015(3): CD005083 (2015).

D. Cianciosi, T.Y. Forbes-Hernández, S. Afrin, M. Gasparrini, P. Reboredo-Rodriguez, P.P. Manna, J. Zhang, L.B. Lamas, S.M. Flórez, A.P. Toyos, and J.L. Quiles. Phenolic compounds in honey and their associated health benefits: A review. Molecules 23(9): 2322 (2018).

J.W. White. Composition of Honey. In: Honey: A Comprehensive Survey, E. Crane (Ed.) Heinemann, London pp. 157-206 (1975).

M.A. Nilforoushzadeh, M.A. Amirkhani, P. Zarrintaj P, A.S. Moghaddam, and T. Mehrabi. Skin care and rejuvenation by cosmeceutical facial mask. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 17: 693-702 (2018).

S. Babacan, and A.G. Rand. Characterization of honey amylase. Journal of Food Science 72: 50-55 (2017).

N. Feknous, and M. Boumendjel. Natural bioactive compounds of honey and their antimicrobial activity. Czech Journal of Food Sciences 40(3): 163-178 (2022).

J. Schreier, R. Feeney, and P. Keeling. Diagnostics Reform and Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Testing. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 21(5): 737-745 (2019).

J.A. Kiehlbauch, G.E. Hannett, M. Salfinger, W. Archinal, C. Monserrat, and C. Carlyn. Use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Guidelines for Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing in New York State Laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38: 3341-3348 (2000).

M. Amin, Z. Rakhisi, and A.Z. Ahmady. Isolation and identification of Bacillus speciesfrom soil and evaluation of their antibacterial properties. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology Infection 2(1): 230-233 (2015).

S.P. Bebko, D.M. Green, and S.S. Awad. Effect of a preoperative decontamination protocol on surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with hardware implantation. JAMA Surgery 150: 390-395 (2015).

O.A. Olowo, Y.K. Ibrahim, B.O. Olayinka, J.O. Ehinmidu. Epidemiology of surgical site infections in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Niger Postgraduate Medical Journal 26:143-51(2019).

P.J. Jenks, M. Laurent, S. McQuarry, and R. Watkins. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) and pre- dicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital. Journal of Hospital Infectious Diseases 86: 24-33 (2014).

G. De Angelis, A. Allignol, A. Murthy, M. Wolkewitz, J. Beyersmann, and E. Safran. Multistate modelling to estimate the excess length of stay associated with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation and infection in surgical patients. Journal of Hospital Infection 78: 86-91 (2011).

J.M. Badia, A.L. Casey, N. Petrosillo, P.M. Hudson, S.A. Mitchell, and C. Crosby. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: A systematic review in six European countries. Journal of Hospital Infection 96: 1-15 (2017).

S. Bhattacharya, K. Pal, S. Jain, S, S. Chatterjee, and J. Konar. Surgical Site Infection by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus-On decline. Journal of Clinical Diagnostic Research 10(9): DC32 (2016).

U. Abubakar. Antibiotic use among hospitalized patients in northern Nigeria: a multicenter point-prevalence survey. BMC Infectious Diseases 20(1): 86 (2020).

C.P. Bhatt, R. Baidya, P. Karki, R.K. Shah, R. Miya, P, Mahashate, and K.K. Mishra. Multi drug resistance bacterial isolates of surgical site infection. Open Journal of Medical Microbiology 4(04): 203 (2014).

M.D. Rajeswari, and S. Mandal. Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 1(12): 154-160 (2011).

M.B. Hussain, A. Hannan, N. Akhtar, G.Q. Fayyaz, M. Imran, S. Saleem, and I.A. Qureshi. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of selected Pakistani honeys against multi-drug resistant Salmonella typhi. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 15(1): 32 (2015).

M.T. Yilmaz. Minimum Inhibitory and minimum bacterial concentration of boron compound against several bacterial strains. Turkish Journal of Medical Science 42(sup.2): 1423-1429 (2012).

S. Mandal, M. DebMandal, N.K. Pal, and K. Saha. Antibacterial activity of honey against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 3(12): 961-964 (2010).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Syeda Rahmat Bibi, Zobia Afsheen, Hamza Iftikhar, Ranra Jalal, Saad Jan, & Syed Majid Rasheed. (2023). Comparative Effect of Honey and Antibiotics against Multi Drug Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Surgical Site Infection. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 60(4), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(60-4)850

Issue

Section

Research Articles