Economics of Inter-Cropping: A Case Study of Onion and Tomato at District Muzaffargarh, Punjab, Pakistan

Authors

  • Muhammad Nisar Khan PARC-Social Sciences Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Gulnaz Hameed Department of Economics & Agri. Economics, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Arshad Mahmood Malik Department of Economics & Agri. Economics, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Saima Asad Department of Economics & Agri. Economics, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(60-3)833

Keywords:

Intercropping, Profitability, Land Equivalent Ratio, Onions and Tomatoes, Muzaffargarh

Abstract

The current research is being conducted in Muzaffargarh district of Punjab, Pakistan to investigate the profitability and land equivalent ratio of intercropping onion and tomato. An economic analysis of intercropping in the Muzaffargarh district can inform farmers about the profitability and sustainability of this practice, aiding their decision-making between intercropping and monocropping. The study utilized a simple random sampling technique to select 45 vegetable growers out of 60, from two major vegetable-growing villages; Hajiwah and Beli Janubi. Descriptive analysis, including frequency distribution, mean, and percentages, was used to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that intercropping had a significantly higher yield (17897 kg/acre) than sole cropping of onions (6075 kg/acre) and tomatoes (16050 kg/acre). Intercropping also had a higher benefit-cost ratio of 1.59, compared to onion sole cropping (1.37) and tomato sole cropping (1.48). The land equivalent ratio was 1.31, which indicated that intercropping was more efficient in terms of land use than sole cropping. The study also revealed that intercropping onions and tomatoes provided additional income to farmers and helped maximize land use. However, farmers encountered challenges such as high seed costs, diseases, low output prices, and high transportation costs. In conclusion, the study suggested that intercropping onion and tomato is a viable agronomic strategy in the Muzaffargarh district, as it improves land-use efficiency and maximizes returns. The study showed that intercropping complemented each other and contributed to increasing yield per unit area and improving nutritional properties.

References

F. Ofori, Francis, and W. R. Stern. Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advances in agronomy 41: 41-90 (1987).

D. Wang, P. Marschner, Z. Solaiman, and Z. Rengel. Growth, P uptake, and rhizosphere properties of intercropped wheat and chickpea in soil amended with iron phosphate or phytate. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39(1): 249-256 (2007).

M.A.D. Dasbak, and J. E. Asiegbu. Performance of pigeon pea genotypes intercropped with maize under humid tropical ultisol conditions. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 4(2): 329-340 (2009).

C. Li, T.J. Stomph, D. Makowski, H. Li, C. Zhang, F. Zhang, and W. van der Werf. The productive performance of intercropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(2): 2201886120 (2023).

X. Tang, C. Zhang, Y. Yu, J. Shen, W. van der Werf, and F. Zhang. Intercropping legumes and cereals increase phosphorus use efficiency; a meta-analysis. Plant. Soil 460: 89–104 (2021).

F. Mamine. Barriers and levers to developing wheat–pea intercropping in Europe: a review. Sustainability 12: 6962 (2020).

K.A. Bybee-Finley, and M.R. Ryan. Advancing intercropping research and practices in industrialized agricultural landscapes. Agriculture 8(6): 80 (2018).

C. Li, E. Hoffland, T.W. Kuyper, Y. Yu, H. Li, C. Zhang, F. Zhang, and W. van der Werf. Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: A meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning. European Journal of Agronomy 113: 125987 (2020).

L. Li, S.M. Li, J. H. Sun, L.L. Zhou, X.G. Bao, H.G. Zhang, & F.S. Zhang. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(27): 11192-11196 (2007).

R.J. Zomer, A. Trabucco, R. Coe, and F. Place. Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. ICRAF Working Paper-World Agroforestry Centre 89: (2009).

H. Hauggaard-Nielsen, and E.S. Jensen. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant and Soil 274(1-2): 237-250 (2005).

A. Hassan, D.B. Dresbøll, C.R. Rasmussen, A. Lyhne-Kjærbye, M.H. Nicolaisen, M.S. Stokholm, Q.S. Lund, and K. Thorup-Kristensen. Root distribution in intercropping systems–a comparison of DNA based methods and visual distinction of roots. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 67(1): 15-28 (2021).

P. Hinsinger, E. Betencourt, L. Bernard, A. Brauman, C. Plassard, J. Shen, X. Tang, and F. Zhang. P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiology 156(3): 1078–1086 (2011).

A. Javanmard, A.D.M. Nasab, A. Javanshir, M. Moghaddam, and H. Janmohammadi. Forage yield and quality in intercropping of maize with different legumes as double-cropped. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 7(1): 163-166 (2009).

M.R. Islam, M. T. Rahman, M. F. Hossain, and N. Ara. Feasibility of intercropping leafy vegetables and legumes with brinjal. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 39(4): 685-692 (2014).

J. Hossain, M. S. Alom, M. A. K. Mian, and M. R. Islam. Economic feasibility of intercropping of chili with sweet gourd. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology 5(2): 64-69 (2015).

L. Rusinamhodzi, M. Corbeels, J. Nyamangara, and K.E. Giller. Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Research 136: 12-22 (2012).

H. Eskandari. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays) with cowpea (Vigna sinensis) and mungbean (Vigna radiata): Effect of complementarity of intercrop components on resource consumption, dry matter production and legumes forage quality. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2(1): 355-360 (2012).

Y.N. Song, F. S. Zhang, P. Marschner, F. L. Fan, H. M. Gao, X. G. Bao, J. H. Sun, and L. Li. Effect of intercropping on crop yield and chemical and microbiological properties in rhizosphere of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Biology and Fertility of Soils 43(5): 565-574 (2007).

Y. He, N. Ding, J. Shi, M. Wu, H. Liao, J. Xu. Profiling of microbial PLFAs: implications for interspecific interactions due to intercropping which increase phosphorus uptake in phosphorus limited acidic soils. Soil Biol. Biochemistry 57: 625–634 (2013).

S. Boora, B. Kaur, R. Tyagiq, and D.K. Bishnoi. Extent of Adoption of Intercropping Practices among Farmers of Haryana. Indian Journal of Extension Education 59(1): 24-27 (2023).

S. Anitha, V.L. Geethakumari, and G.R. Pilial. Effect of intercrops on nutrient uptake and productivity of chilli-based cropping system. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 39(1): 60-61 (2006).

A.J. Burgess, M.E.C. Cano, and B. Parkes The deployment of intercropping and agroforestry as adaptation to climate change. Crop and Environment (2022).

Z. An, M. Zhang, J.H. Qin, H.G. Hu, and T.Y. Ning. Effects of wheat-maize/alfalfa intercropping mode on soil salinity and annual yield in saline-alkali field. Shandong Agricultural Sciences 51(06): 69-74 (2019).

R. Francis, D.R. Decoteau. Developing an effective southern pea and sweet corn intercrop system. HortTechnology 3(2): 178-184 (1993).

M.A. Awal, H. Koshi, and T. Ikeda. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and forest meteorology 139(1-2): 74-83 (2006).

J.M.M. Matusso, J.N. Mugwe, and M. Mucheru-Muna. Potential role of cereal-legume intercropping systems in integrated soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management 3(3): 162-174 (2014).

T.H. Seran, and I. Brintha. Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of Agronomy 135-145 (2010).

L. Ren, S. Su, X. Yang, Y. Xu, Q. Huang, Q. Shen. Intercropping with aerobic rice suppressed Fusarium wilt in watermelon. Soil biology and biochemistry 40(3): 834–844 (2008).

R.W. Brooker, A.E. Bennett, W.F. Cong, T.J. Daniell, T.S. George, P.D. Hallett, L. Li. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 206(1): 107-117 (2015).

F. Sulvai, B.J.M. Chaúque, and D.L.P. Macuvele. Intercropping of lettuce and onion controls caterpillar thread, Agrotis ípsilon major insect pest of lettuce. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 3(1): 1-5 (2016).

S. Daryanto, B. Fu, W. Zhao, S. Wang, P.A. Jacinthe, and L.Wang. Ecosystem service provision of grain legume and cereal intercropping in Africa. Agricultural Systems 178: 102761 (2020).

F.T. Hata, M.U. Ventura, M.T.D. Paula, G.D. Shimizu., J.C.B.D. Paula, D.A.O. Kussaba, and N.V.D. Souza. Intercropping garlic in strawberry fields improves land equivalent ratio and gross income. Ciência Rural 49: (2019).

W. Tang, W. Tang, Y. Xie, X. Li, H. Li, L. Lin, Z. Huang, B. Sun, G. Sun., L. Tu, and Y. Tang. Effects of intercropping on Se accumulation and growth of pakchoi, lettuce and radish. International Journal of Phytoremediation 1-8 (2022).

F. Zhang, and L. Li. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and soil 248(1): 305-312 (2003).

L. Mrnka, T. Frantík, C.S. Schmidt, S. E. Baldassarre, and M. Vosátka. Intercropping of Tagetes patula with cauliflower and carrot increases yield of cauliflower and tentatively reduces vegetable pests. International Journal of Pest Management 69(1): 35-45 (2023).

L. Rusinamhodzi, M. Corbeels, J. Nyamangara, and K.E. Giller. Maize–grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field crops research 136: 12-22 (2012).

R. Bhattacharyya, S. Kundu, R. Pandey, and M. Sharma. Resource use efficiency and productivity of maize and soybean in intercropping system under conservation agriculture practices. Agricultural Research 8(3): 348-355 (2019).

M.A. Altieri. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74(1-3): 19-31 (1999).

J.A. Odhiambo, G. Mutua, and A.M. Kibe. Intercropping in smallholder farming systems of Kenya: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 121(1): 21-30 (2020).

Q. Lv, B. Chi, N. He, D. Zhang, J. Dai, Y. Zhang, and H. Dong. Cotton-Based Rotation, Intercropping, and Alternate Intercropping Increase Yields by Improving Root–Shoot Relations. Agronomy 13(2): 413 (2023).

H.B. Zhou, J. L. Chen, L.I.U. Yong, F. Francis, E. Haubruge, C. Bragard, J. R. Sun, and D.F. Cheng. Influence of garlic intercropping or active emitted volatiles in releasers on aphid and related beneficial in wheat fields in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 12(3): 467-473 (2013).

A.H.M.M.R. Talukder, J. Rahman, M.M. Rahman, M. Biswas, and M. Asaduzzaman. Optimum ratio of coriander intercropping with onion. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 4(94): 404-410 (2015).

B.H. Kabura, B. Musa, and P. E. Odo. Evaluation of the yield components and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.)-pepper (Capsicum annum L.) intercrop in the Sudan Savanna. Journal of Agronomy (2008).

T. Soniya, S. Kamalakannan, T. Uma Maheswari, and R. Sudhagar. Effect of intercropping on growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Annals of Plant and Soil Research 23(1): 36-41 (2021).

X. Wu, F. Wu, X. Zhou, X. Fu, Y. Tao, W. Xu, K. Pan, and S. Liu. Effects of intercropping with potato onion on the growth of tomato and rhizosphere alkaline phosphatase genes diversity. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 846 (2016).

S.H. Abdel-Baset. Effect of intercropping onion with sugar beet on productivity of both crops and root-knot nematodes control under different onion plant densities and slow-release N fertilizer rates. Journal of Plant Production Sciences 9(1): 61-75 (2020).

A. Nigussie, B. Lulie, and M. Chala, M. Intercropping of Onion with Rosemary as Supplementary Income Generation at Wondo Genet Sidama zone, Southern Ethiopia. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 5(2): 107-115 (2017).

R. Mead, and R. W. Willey. The concept of a "land equivalent ratio" and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16(3): 217-228 (1980).

T. Soniya, S. Kamalakannan, T.U. Maheswari, R. Sudhagar, S. Kumar. Effect of intercropping on yield, system production efficiency and economics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Crop Research 56(1and2): 23-29 (2021).

E. Yildirim, and I. Guvenc. Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable. European Journal of Agronomy 22(1): 11-18 (2005).

M. M. Lamlom, and A. M. Ahmed. Effect of sesame-tomatoes intercropping systems under different dates of sesame on improving productivity of crops. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 99(1): 108-117 (2021).

S.H. Abdel-Baset. Effect of intercropping onion with sugar beet on productivity of both crops and root-knot nematodes control under different onion plant densities and slow-release N fertilizer rates. Journal of Plant Production Sciences 9(1): 61-75 (2020).

A.U. Ahmed, B.M. Auwalu, H.M. Garba, I.G. Halilu, and M.B. Adamu Response of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and Onion (Allium cepa L.) to Different Intercrops in Sudan Savanna Ecological Zone of Nigeria. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 11(3): 49-53 (2023).

Downloads

Published

2023-09-04

How to Cite

Muhammad Nisar Khan, Gulnaz Hameed, Arshad Mahmood Malik, & Saima Asad. (2023). Economics of Inter-Cropping: A Case Study of Onion and Tomato at District Muzaffargarh, Punjab, Pakistan. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 60(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(60-3)833

Issue

Section

Research Articles