Dietary Preferences and Their Impact on the Life Cycles of Bactrocera Zonata and Bactrocera Dorsalis

Authors

  • Chandni Kiran Department of Animal Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
  • Maisoor Ahmad Nafees Department of Animal Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
  • Nasreen Department of Animal Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
  • Tika Khan Department of Plant Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
  • Akbar Khan Department of Animal Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
  • Saif Ud Din Department of Animal Sciences, Karakoram International University Gilgit, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(63-1)1090

Keywords:

Biological Control, Fruit Flies, Mass Rearing, Artificial Diet, Cucurbitaceae, Fruit Preference, Larval Diet

Abstract

This study aimed to contribute to the biological control of two  economically  significant fruit flies species, Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera dorsalis. The research examined the effects of different host fruit species and artificial larval diets on their development.. Experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions (28 ± 2 °C, 60-65% relative humidity).  Specified five fruit varities as host including apple (Malus sylvestris), guava (Psidium guajava), mango (Mangifera indica), persimmon (Diospyros kaki), and pomegranate (Punica granatum). Key biological parameters taken into consideration were egg production, larval and pupal development time, survival rate, adult emergence percentages, and sex ratios. Comparisons were made between liquid and solid artificial diets under different host conditions. Results revealed that P. guajava was the most favorable host, yielding optimal egg production (297.3 ± 9.3), larval numbers (261 ± 3.2), pupal counts (237.6 ± 27.1), and adult emergence rates (86.9 ± 3.9%). Similarly, P. granatum exhibited the longest egg hatching duration (2.3 ± 0.3 days) and larval development time (7.6 ± 0.3 days). While M. sylvestris and D. kaki showed maximum pupal duration (4.3 ± 0.3 days). Solid artificial diets produced higher egg numbers (408 ± 108.3) and extended developmental periods compared to liquid diets, though liquid diets achieved superior adult emergence rates (80 ± 2.8%). It is concluded that P. guajava serves optimally for Bactr ocera mass rearing. Moreover, solid diets enhance reproduction while liquid diets improve adult emergence. This can help and inform existing and future biological control programs.

References

[1]. A.A.K.H. Negm, T.A. El-Desouky, A. Afify, and H.A.S. Elelimy. Phytosanitary ozone treatment for guava infested with Bactrocera zonata and mandarin infested with Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(4): 89-98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijas.2023.241873.1313

[2]. K.M. Zingore, G. Sithole, E.M. Abdel‐Rahman, S.A. Mohamed, S. Ekesi, C.M. Tanga, and M.E.E. Mahmoud. Global risk of invasion by Bactrocera zonata: Implications on horticultural crop production under changing climatic conditions. PLOS One 15(12): e0243047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243047

[3]. M. Momen, M. Shahjalal, M.A. Rahman, M.A. Hossain, M.K. Munshi, and K. Seheli. Assessment of meridic larval and adult diets for mass rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). PLOS One 20(10): e0335213 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335213

[4]. Y-H. Wang, S-L. Wee, S.D. Faveri, V. Gagic, S. Hossain, D-F. Cheng, B. Chouangthavy, P. Han, H-B. Jiang, P. Krutmuang, H. Lee, X-F. Liu, W. Shi, T. Sophak, Z-P. Ye, X-M. Zhang, Z-H. Zhao, A-M. Zhou, Y-C. Dong, S. Zhan, C-Y. Niu, and Y-Y. Lu. Advancements in Integrated Pest Management strategies for Bactrocera dorsalis in Asia: current status, insights, and future prospects. Entomologia Generalis 44(5): 1091 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2024/2711

[5]. K.J. Andrews, R. Bester, A. Manrakhan, and H.J. Maree. A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of economic importance in South Africa. Scientific Report 12: 13089 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17382-x

[6]. R.I. Vargas, J.C. Piñero, and L. Leblanc. An Overview of Pest Species of Bactrocera Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Integration of Biopesticides with Other Biological Approaches for Their Management with a Focus on the Pacific Region. Insects 6(2): 297-318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6020297

[7]. N.M. Eissa, M.K. Daif, H.A. Elsherif, A.M.Z. Mosallam, and D.H.A. El-Monem. Morphogenetic effects of crude extracts and essential oils of certain medicinal and aromatic plants against some immature stages of bactrocera zonata (saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 97(3): 519-528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2019.152491

[8]. R. Megha, S.K. Singh, M. Srivastav, V. Kalia, N. Sharma, C. Kumar, and N. Singh. Population dynamics of fruit flies and correlation matrix with weather and host variables in mango (Mangifera indica) orchards. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 93(10): 1132-1138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i10.138967

[9]. J.L. Hoskins, P. Rempoulakis, M.M. Stevens, and B.C. Dominiak. Biosecurity and Management Strategies for Economically Important Exotic Tephritid Fruit Fly Species in Australia. Insects 14(10): 801 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100801

[10]. I. Grechi, M. Léchaudel, and A. Ratnadass. Management of fruit fly damage via mango harvest timing optimization: a modelling approach. Acta Horticulturae 1415: 249 (2025). https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2025.1415.30

[11]. A.A. Amin. Field and laboratory studies on infestation of immature mango fruits by the peach fruit fly, bactrocera zonara (saunders). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 95(1): 89 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2017.146275

[12]. A. Nawaz, M. Binyameen, S. Amjad, M.Z. Zafer, D. Law, M.F. Elsadek, N. Altwaijry, D.K.Y. Tan, and M. Yasin. Effect of Interspecific Competition Between Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) on the Life History Traits. Entomological Research 55(10): e70050 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.70050

[13]. G. Delrio and A. Cocco. the peach fruit fly, Bactrocera Zonata: a major threat for mediterranean fruit crops? Acta Horticulturae 940: 557 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.940.80

[14]. D.A.I. Drew and D.L. Hancock. Biogeography, Speciation and Taxonomy within the genus Bactrocera Macquart with application to the Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) complex of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae). Zootaxa 5190(3): 333-360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5190.3.2

[15]. G. Murtaza, M. Ramzan, W. Majeed, S. Maalik, Z. Abbas, H.S. Hussein, A. Hedfi, and M.B. Ali. Comparative analysis of different fruits to determine the fitness parameters of Bactrocera dorsalis (diptera: tephritidae) using age-stage, two sex life table. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 23(4): 6545-6555 (2025). https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2304_65456555

[16]. S. Sarangi, S.D. Mohapatra, G.P. Pandi, P. Bhavana, S. Sahoo, P.P. Pradhan and S.S. Dash. Menace of fruit flies and its eco-friendly management practices using several modern techniques. In: Enhancing Crop Resilience: Advances in Climate Smart Crop Production Technologies (Chapter 8). A. Kumar, R.P. Sah, B. Gowda, J.K. Dey, A. Debnath, and B. Das (Eds.). BIOTICA Publishers pp. 144-156 (2024).

[17]. S.A. Halila. The use of the pesticide dimethoate and cyberkill in combating the fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) on oranges (Citrus fruits). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 12(3):172 (2024). https://www.doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2024.v12.i3b.9331

[18]. M. Hasnain, S. Saeed, U.N. Ullah, S. Ullah, and S.M. Zaka. Synergist response of the Peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) to some ammonium based proteinaceous food bait attractants. BMC Zoology 8: 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-023-00178-5

[19]. G. Murtaza, M. Ramzan, H. Bilal, A. Ejaz, M.A.A. Khan, T. Riaz, and M. Waqas. Monitoring of fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae) population by installing traps in mango orchard Bahawalnagar, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences 2(2): 148-151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.2.19

[20]. W. Jaleel, X. Tao, D. Wang, L. Lu and Y. He. Using Two-Sex Life Table Traits to Assess the Fruit Preference and Fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 111(6): 2936-2945 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy243

[21]. E-H. Chen Q-L. Hou, D-D. Wei, H-B Jiang, and J-J Wang. Phenotypic plasticity, trade-offs and gene expression changes accompanying dietary restriction and switches in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Scientific Reports 7: 1998 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02106-3

[22]. Q. Chen, Y. Duan, X. Wang, X. Zheng, and W. Lu. Insights into pupal development of Bactrocera dorsalis: factors influencing eclosion. Scientific Reports 14: 27981 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79526-5

[23]. S. Kaur, S. Singh, P. Mohanpuria, and Z. Li. Successful rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis on a semi-solid artificial diet. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(9): 1342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116083

[24]. S.M.M. Shah, N. Ahmad, M. Sarwar, and M. Tofique. Rearing of Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for parasitoids production and managing techniques for fruit flies in mango orchards. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 34(S1): S108-S113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742758414000137

[25]. K. Nébié, I. Zakaria, P. Soumaila, Z.H. Delphine, and D. Rémy. Performance of two food substrates in the mass rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). Advances in Entomology 11(3): 188-203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2023.113014

[26]. B. Hassan, J.A. Siddiqui, and Y. Xu. Vertically Transmitted Gut Bacteria and Nutrition Influence the Immunity and Fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis Larvae. Frontiers in Microbiology 11: 596352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.596352

[27]. T. Sharmitha, V. Balasubramani, T. Elaiyabharathi, M. Raveendran, L Pugalendhi, and E. Kokiladevi. Evaluating artificial diets for cucurbit fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquilett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) maggots through age-stage, two sex life table approach. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 44: 2471–2480 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-024-01352-z

[28]. F.M. Anato, A.H. Bokonon‐Ganta, D. Gnanvossou, R. Hanna, and C.L. Chang. Assessment of a liquid larval diet for rearing Dacus species and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 141(10): 860-865 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12419

[29]. G.P. Gupta, S. Rani, A. Birah, and M. Raghuraman. Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 25(1): 55-58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200551

[30]. I. Shinwari, S. Khan, M.A. Khan, S. Ahmad, S.F. Shah, M.A. Mashwani, and M.A. Khan. Evaluation of artificial larval diets for the rearing of fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 3(4): 189-193 (2015). https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/?year=2015&vol=3&issue=4&ArticleId=569

[31]. I. Rauf, N. Ahmad, S.M.M.S. Rashdi, M. Ismail, and M.H. Khan. Laboratory studies on the ovipositional preference of the peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephiritidae) for different host fruits. African Journal of Agriculture Research 8(15): 1300-1303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.6744

[32]. M. Farooq and S. Freed. Combined effects of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) and insecticide mixtures on biological parameters of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 48(5): 1465-1476 (2016). https://www.zsp.com.pk/pdf48/1465-1476%20(33)%20QPJZ-0419-2015-F%201-7-16%20Revised1.pdf

[33]. McGraw-Hill C. Statistix 8.1 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida). Maurice/Thomas (2008).

[34]. C.E. Reisenman, and K. Scott. Food-derived volatiles enhance consumption in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology 222(10): jeb202762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202762

[35]. V.K. Kalia and B. Yadav. Cost-effective mass rearing of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) round the year. International Research Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2(6): 143-155 (2015). https://www.aarf.asia/current/XsiJSVbvbt2s4fr.pdf

[36]. M. Sarwar, M. Hamed, B. Rasool, M. Yousaf, and M. Hussain. Host preference and performance of fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) for various fruits and vegetables. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences 1(8): 188 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.12983/ijsres-2013-p188-194

[37]. P. Sookar, M. Alleck, N. Ahseek, S. Permalloo, S. Bhagwant, and C. L. Chang. Artificial rearing of the peach fruit flies Bactrocera zonata (Diptera: Tephritidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 34(S1): S99-S107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758414000125

[38]. M. Momen, M. Shahjalal, M.A. Rahman, M.A.Hossain, M.K. Munshi, and K. Seheli. Assessment of meridic larval and adult diets for mass rearing of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). PLoS One 20(10): e0335213 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335213

[39]. K.K. Abro, N. Baloch, and F.A. Hattar. Efficiency of Episyrphus balteatus larvae against Myzus persicae An: In-depth laboratory analysis. Pure and Applied Biology 14(2): 402-411 (2025). http://dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2025.140039

[40]. R.A. Rabab, M.A. Al-Eryan, A.M. El-Minshawy, and G.G. Gadelhak. Laboratory rearing of the peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on semi-artificial diet based on soybean protein. Alexandria Journal Agricultural Science 61(3): 175-183 (2016). https://dtisartec.senasica.gob.mx:8080/biblioteca/libros/articulos/Rafiaa.%20A.%20Rabab._et,al_2016_3%20.pdf.pdf

[41]. W. Jaleel, R. Saeed, M.Z. Shabbir, R. Azad, S. Ali, M.U. Sial, D.M. Aljedani, H.A. Ghramh, K.A. Khan, D. Wang, and Y. He. Olfactory response of two different Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on banana, guava, and mango fruits. Journal of King Saud University Science 33(5): 101455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101455

[42]. R.N. Miano, S.A. Mohamed, X. Cheseto, S. Ndlela, T.D. Biasazin, A.A. Yusuf, E. Rohwer, and T. Dekker. Differential responses of Bactrocera dorsalis and its parasitoids to headspaces of different varieties of tree-attached mango fruits and the associated chemical profiles. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1021795 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1021795

[43]. V. Kempraj, J. Auth, D.H. Cha, and C.J. Mason. Impact of Larval Food Source on the Stability of the Bactrocera dorsalis Microbiome. Microbial Ecology 87: 46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02352-9

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

Chandni Kiran, Maisoor Ahmad Nafees, Nasreen, Tika Khan, Akbar Khan, & Saif Ud Din. (2026). Dietary Preferences and Their Impact on the Life Cycles of Bactrocera Zonata and Bactrocera Dorsalis. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 63(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(63-1)1090

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.