Investigating the Effects of Horizontal Transition with Student-Preferred Learning Materials in a Virtual Biology Laboratory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(61-4)878Keywords:
Virtual Reality, Virtual Learning Environment, Virtual Biology Laboratory, Learning Approach, Student Learning Styles, Horizontal Transition, Vertical TransitionAbstract
Adaptive Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) present customized teaching materials to individual students which help them to achieve their learning goals and serve quite a vital role in virtual learning environments. In this paper, we present a new student-centered learning approach in a three-dimensional (3D) virtual biology laboratory (VBIOLAB). The approach is based on the concept of horizontal transition with student preference (HTWSP) implemented with the help of VBIOLAB. The HTWSP is based on the concept of allowing students to choose their preferred learning styles according to their needs and pace instead of automatically adapted aids. HTWSP allows students to stay in a certain module and attain more information about that learning module through various aids of their choice. To go to the next learning module there is a mechanism of vertical transition which allows a student to make quick progress by skipping the details about a certain module. Intermediate-level students participated in experiments that compared the proposed system with an adaptive virtual laboratory. Experimental results indicated that 75% of students improved their examination scores through the use of VBIOLAB. Data from the system usability scale (SUS) and the subjective rating supported greater participation, motivation, and effectiveness in learning using VBIOLAB. The experimental results reveal that this approach is effective and vital to utilize to enhance students’ learning in 3D-VLEs.
References
J. Wei, J. He, J. Liu, G. Xuan, Y. Wei, X. Jiang, S. Luo, and F. Mao. Application research of virtual reality in technology in landscape design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1302(4): 042050 (2019).
C. Christou. Virtual reality in education. In: Affective, interactive and cognitive methods for e-learning design: creating an optimal education experience. A. Tzanavari and N. Tsapatsoulis (Eds.) IGI Global Scientific Publishing pp. 228-243 (2010).
A. Sypsas and D. Kalles. Virtual laboratories in biology, biotechnology and chemistry education: a literature review. In Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, (29th November- 1st December 2018) Athens, Greece (2018).
R. Subramanian and I. Marsic. ViBE: Virtual biology experiments. In: Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on World Wide Web 2001. Hong Kong Hong Kong, (May 1 - 5, 2001) pp. 316-325 (2001).
P. Papadopoulou, K.T. Chui, L. Daniela, and M.D. Lytras. Virtual and augmented reality in medical education and training: innovative ways for transforming medical education in the 21st century. In: Cognitive computing in technology-enhanced learning. M.D. Lytras, N. Aljohani, L. Daniela, and A. Visvizi (Eds.). IGI Global Scientific Publishing pp. 109-150 (2019).
A. Alam, S. Ullah, and N. Ali. The effect of learning-based Adaptivity on students’ performance in 3D-virtual learning environments. IEEE Access 6: 3400-3407 (2017).
A. Alam and S. Ullah. Adaptive 3D-Virtual Learning Environments: From Students' Learning Perspective. 2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), IEEE (1st December 2016), Islamabad, Pakistan pp. 7-10 (2016).
L. Chittaro and R. Ranon. Adaptive hypermedia techniques for 3D educational virtual environments. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(4): 31-7 (2007).
R.A. Kockro, C. Amaxopoulou, T. Killeen, W. Wagner, R. Reisch, E. Schwandt, A. Gutenberg, A. Giese, E. Stofft, and A.T. Stadie. Stereoscopic neuro anatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 201: 91-98 (2015).
J.H. Seo, B.M. Smith, M. Cook, E. Malone, M. Pine, S. Leal, Z. Bai, and J. Suh. Anatomy builder VR: Applying a constructive learning method in the virtual reality canine skeletal system. Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. Proceedings of the AHFE 2017. In: International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences, Springer International Publishing (July 17-21 2018). Los Angeles, California, USA pp. 245-252 (2018).
C. Byukusenge, F. Nsanganwimana, and A.P. Tarmo. Investigating the effect of virtual laboratories on students’ academic performance and attitudes towards learning biology. Education and Information Technology 29(1): 1147-1171 (2024).
O. Troyer, F. Kleinermann, and A. Ewais. Enhancing virtual reality learning environments with adaptivity: Lessons learned. In: HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure: G. Leitner, M. Hitz, and A. Holzinger (Eds.) USAB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6389. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg pp. 244-265 (2010).
S. Jang, J.M. Vitale, R.W. Jyung, and J.B. Black. Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers & Education 106: 150-65 (2017).
N. Cristina, M. Arias, C. Carolina, A. Henríquez, and P. Riquelme. Assessment of Student and Teacher Perceptions on the Use of Virtual Simulation in Cell Biology Laboratory Education. Education Sciences 14(3): 243 (2024).
D. An and M. Carr. Learning styles theory fails to explain learning and achievement: Recommendations for alternative approaches. Personality and Individual Differences 116: 410-6 (2017).
D. Tsirulnikov, C. Suart, R. Abdullah, F. Vulcu, and C.E. Mullarkey. Game on: immersive virtual laboratory simulation improves student learning outcomes & motivation. FEBS Open Bio 13(3):396-407 (2023).
I. Reisoğlu, B. Topu, R. Yılmaz, T. Karakuş, and Y. Göktaş. 3D virtual learning environments in education: A meta- eview. Asia Pacific Education Review 18: 81-100 (2017).
T.M. Gunathilaka, M.S. Fernando, and H. Pasqual. Individual learning path personalization approach in a virtual learning environment according to the dynamically changing learning styles and knowledge levels of the learner. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 5(5): 10-9 (2018).
M.T. Alshammari. Design and evaluation of an adaptive framework for virtual learning environments, International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 7(5): 39-51 (2020).
J. Brooke. SUS: a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies 8(2): 29-40 (2013).
